I’ll throw this out there one more time too since it seems to get hazed over…….Its simply using “data” to cherry pick what you like and what you don’t when you scrutinize “the numbers” of an trapping incentive to this degree while corn baiting and decoys are legalized without numbers even being questioned. Why does one have to produce numbers showing it to be the end all cure all solution while the others don’t have to show anything concerning negative impacts??.....Just using common sense will tell you that the potential chances for negative impacts of those last two are far greater than any trapping incentive. This is just agenda driven decision making.