Yes the point was to increase surveillance in an infected area to determine prevalence of the disease. Eradication is not part of the plan. It’s ok. I have no desire to derail this tread either. That just caught my attention.
I will concede that I could have phrased that a little better. I trended toward hyperbole there a little and should not have. However, I don't think I would have agreed with killing them. We know they're gonna die after we harvest them.
I'd like to extend personal and professional respect here. I have seen your post, and know you to be a stand up guy. I will respond to my email and make it clear that eradication should not have been interpreted from that particular talking point.
