|
|
|
Velvet
by Turkey_neck. 05/04/24 09:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
142 registered members (kyles, WEMOhunter, Sasquatch Lives, Bandit635, Semo, Mike32, Antlerfluke, WPZJR, Backwards cowboy, coosabuckhunter, zwick, MikeP, auman, 7PTSPREAD, Remington270, Whild_Bill, sj22, ronfromramer, JustHunt, hallb, jawbone, Scout308, BearBranch, beerhunter, tmhrmh1, Shmoe, jeffhhub, AuGrayghost, GoldenEagle, BCLC, kodiak06, Grumman, TexasHuntress, bamapanic, Ridge Life, BrentsFX4, icducks, goodman_hunter, cdaddy14, BraeBuckner, Gizmo76, Young20, jwyatt, GomerPyle, baitstop, Narrow Gap, gobbler, hyco, Tall Dog, Squadron77, Mjh97, Lockjaw, clayk, AU7MM08, woodduck, dtmwtp, CNC, joe sixpack, Floorman1, murf205, Sgt_mike, BPI, turkey247, bama_earl, Skillet, MTeague, mopar, Moose24, hunter84, Overland, Dragfan66, slanddeerhunter, odocoileus, BatesConst, mathews prostaff, FastXD, hitek, CTMS, William, Cannon Kid, mossyback, billrv, JHH, trlrdrdave, WhoMe, Auto5, snakebit, RSF, Gulfcoast, Mbrock, Cactus_buck, jono23, jb20, metalmuncher, Treelimb, jprice, cch, NVM1031, 7mmSTW, outdoorguy88, oakachoy, gman, canichols424, BAR1225, thayerp81, jaredhunts, Andalusia, MarksOutdoors, ALDawg, mccarrc, Bows4evr, TwentySeven, OutdoorsAL, Bread, Paint Rock 00, TamaDrumhead, 2walnuts, crocker, crenshawco, demp17, furnfeather, jwalker77, Turkeyneck78, JBrown1975, buzzard, abolt300, 10 POINT, JHL, Shaneomac2, El_Matador, brett.smith, treemydog, 3Gs, 9 invisible),
1,139
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Soil sample results ?
[Re: mike35549]
#3176443
07/26/20 09:40 AM
07/26/20 09:40 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 203 South Montgomery County, AL
Ragin-Cajun
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 203
South Montgomery County, AL
|
we've used the Auburn soil testing lab for years. our results from the AU lab were recently all over the map from comparable samples taken over the last 5 years. for fun this summer is sent the same 10 field soil samples to AU and LSU soil testing labs.... the LSU recommendations were much more consistent w fertilizer recommendations as compared to the actual K/P levels in each field. the field PH levels were consistent from both labs- with the AU PH levels ALWAYS lower.. now out of 10 fields- both AU and LSU had the identical top (or bottom) 3 fields that need K/potassium or P/phosphorous etc. but the AU numbers were just not consistent.. w/ respect to the actual lbs of recommended fert. i think AU needs to re-calibrate their equipment. my 2 cents.
note: from both labs it was consistently clear that our sandy soils are always higher in P but lower in K. soils with more clay are higher in K but lower in P.
Last edited by Ragin-Cajun; 07/26/20 10:35 AM.
|
|
|
|