Originally Posted by BhamFred
Originally Posted by capehorn24
Originally Posted by sgtred
Not for me to say, I was on the inside looking out. Those on the outside looking in , more qualified to make those suggestions, I am like the officer in Crenshaw ,as my career went forward I came to realize that I worked for the hunters and fisherman. We were all in it together. I haven't been gone long enough to have clarity on what changes would benefit both the Dept and the hunters. I believe any change should benefit both mutually, with the resources well-being, being of the utmost concern. Thats a difficult balance, so I think maybe , sometimes the powers that be, should be given the chance to explain their reasoning on any changes. Never going to make everyone happy.


Every one is stating their opinion he's mine. That answer is a cop out, if you work somewhere for 30 years you know what works from the inside looking out. You know what the problems are but you come on here wanting every one else to help solve the problems knowing all we can pretty much do is belly ache on the computer screen. Folks on here have called, emailed complained etc. but with no results but have tried. About the only way things get changed is from the inside (ex: TRUMP). I guess my biggest issue is if you were there for 30 years and can't see the problems and some solutions you got what you wanted a paycheck and retirement.

For the record don't know Chuck so i'll stay away from that discussion, but GW's I guess do the best they can with what they have to work with.



I can promise you from an "insider" viewpoint that the opinions/thoughts/recomendations from the game wardens are ignored and thrown in the waste paper basket at the first opportunity by the administration in Montgomery.


Sounds like the same MO used on opinions/thoughts/recommendations from the general public.


"Why do you ask"?

Always vote the slowest path to socialism.