Originally Posted by goodman_hunter
Originally Posted by Clem
Originally Posted by goodman_hunter

I have no clue, honestly. There's really not any way for someone to prove it one way or the other so it isn't of any significance in my life. I feel as though science and Genesis may both be right. I was just pointing out that ikillbux said there was only 2% genetic difference in humans yet there was only 1% genetic difference between us and chimps.



You're not pointing out a 1% difference. You stated that humans now had tails and have remnants of them, "but we evolved."

I guess you believe in evolution.

try to follow along, i said we are 99% the same as chimps
jmudler said that was incorrect because we didnt have tails.
i said we had tails at one time (vestigial tail) and vestigial organs (appendix)
I don't think the tail is what makes the 1% difference between humans and chimps. As far as evolution goes I'm pretty sure things do evolve, take this thread for instance. As far as where humans came from, I have no clue and neither do you. But humans of today aren't the same as the first humans, which is what originally made me question the "in his image" question.


Evolution takes more faith then Creationism in my opinion. Much more faith.