|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Iso
by AustinC. 05/21/24 05:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 registered members (Gunpowder, Kicker, wk2hnt, JHL, bhammedic84, Shotts, Mulcher, beetrapper, Bread, Jehu, UncleHuck, Richard Cranium, HoofNSpur, JB357, DoubleShoalsJR, goodman_hunter, bambam32, Birdman83, AL18, akbejeepin, NotsoBright, EricS, MGrubber, RareBreed, AustinC, Rolloverdave, SilentButDeadly, Bronco 74, coldtrail, Whitetaillane, kyles, Fullthrottle, dave260rem!, doublefistful, mossyback, 3bailey3, ALMODUX, Pwyse, lectrode, TexasHuntress, Roondog, BCLC, Turkey, OutdoorsAL, FreeStateHunter, Calvin, Dixiepatriot, jwalker77, GATA87, limabean, GomerPyle, Safetyman, cdaddy14, Showout, centralala, DoeNut, TDog93, Jtd, CNC, MattIce, bowkl, Whild_Bill, Jdkprp70, crenshawco, BrentsFX4, Bjoff27, S_Dubs, MS_Hunter, CrappieMan, deadeye48, Fishhead706, Narrow Gap, NorthFork, MidnightRider, jb20, buzzard, auwardamn, roosterbob, Rainbowstew, shootnmiss, bodock, brianr, outdoorguy88, 3006bullet, turfarmer, Ant67, having fun now, Xbow, Gut Pile 32, Paddlejon, ALDawg, Hunter454, sj22, Gobble4me757, Dean, oldbowhunter, Cutem, Jmoore77, SEWoodsWhitetail, deerman24, Cfh76, TEM, Joe4majors, Turkeyneck78, Ron A., Luvbowhuntn, Herbie, mauvilla, Claims Rep., rutwad, sawdust, fourfive45, 12 invisible),
873
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Arkansas to Non-Resident Waterfowlers: Screw You
[Re: CeeHawk37]
#2561039
08/24/18 10:17 PM
08/24/18 10:17 PM
|
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 6,363 On the X
TickaTicka
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 6,363
On the X
|
Dang. You’d think the $300+ license fee that non-residents pay on top of leases, food, lodging, etc. would be enough. Didn’t know we had folks that would actually advocate for limiting non resident hunting opportunities.
I think Arkansas is making a big mistake by limiting opportunities to non-residents. I figure that will put a decent dent in their economy when folks go elsewhere to hunt. You can either take the revenue or let the locals have the public ground, but you can’t have both. I don't know man, lots of trucks head west for duck season from the SE, so if you limit it, they'll just head west at a different time.. Most of those are headed to private ground anyway, which isn't part of this.
Public Land Owner
|
|
|
|