|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
70 registered members (bambam32, 000buck, buzzard, MarksOutdoors, hallb, k bush, M48scout, leroycnbucks, Pwyse, DoubleShoalsJR, Fattyfireplug, bass1090, Four_Horse, kyles, Tree Dweller, Paxamus, bamabeagler, 2walnuts, sw1002, doublefistful, Ol Backwoods Boy, Flyliner, CatfishJunkie, having fun now, duxlayer, Tree Hanger, NotsoBright, Woody1, AU7MM08, Narrow Gap, Exhoosier, ALMODUX, CrappieMan, COOTER, AJones, Jweeks, brianr, Bread, booner, Jbf, punisher338, Justice, BuckRidge17, Shmoe, Herdbull, BrentsFX4, Skullworks, Bmyers142, Coosa buck, outdoorguy88, kpswihart, crenshawco, Ron A., TEM, jaredhunts, mopar, Ben2, EricS, dave260rem!, just_an_illusion, Hunting-231, Teacher One, Zzzfog, Zbrann, Luxfisher, graydw1, joe sixpack, 3 invisible),
1,090
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Arkansas to Non-Resident Waterfowlers: Screw You
[Re: Abbhudson]
#2560086
08/23/18 08:33 PM
08/23/18 08:33 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,148
jallencrockett
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,148
|
I think that states should 100 percent manage their resources for the vast usage to be limited to residents only on public land. ALABAMA SHOULD VASTLY limit NR hunting all they can on both private and state owned props.
This is just better for the regular guy. However, on fed property inside of state there should be equal non resident and resident access in my opinion. You want the state to dictate who can hunt on privately owned lands? That seems like the 1st step down a very slippery slope. Yes I do to the extent that NR pay so much or limited opportunity that it would allow locals an opportunity to afford leases due to a decrease of supply and demand... this is more so for big game as waters are typically federal.
Last edited by jallencrockett; 08/23/18 08:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
