|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
74 registered members (Mansfield, bodock, Bruno, deadeye48, gman, capehorn24, k bush, M48scout, mossyback, zwick, COOTER, roll_tide_hunts, Jbf, TheVern, crenshawco, CatfishJunkie, bhammedic84, DoubleShoalsJR, MarksOutdoors, ultratec00, leroycnbucks, Dragfan66, Four_Horse, bambam32, buzzard, 000buck, hallb, Pwyse, Fattyfireplug, bass1090, kyles, Tree Dweller, Paxamus, bamabeagler, 2walnuts, sw1002, doublefistful, Ol Backwoods Boy, Flyliner, having fun now, duxlayer, Tree Hanger, NotsoBright, Woody1, AU7MM08, Narrow Gap, Exhoosier, ALMODUX, CrappieMan, AJones, Jweeks, brianr, Bread, booner, punisher338, Justice, BuckRidge17, Shmoe, Herdbull, BrentsFX4, Skullworks, Bmyers142, Coosa buck, outdoorguy88, kpswihart, Ron A., TEM, jaredhunts, mopar, Ben2, EricS, 3 invisible),
1,135
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Arkansas to Non-Resident Waterfowlers: Screw You
[Re: Clem]
#2560039
08/23/18 07:40 PM
08/23/18 07:40 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 814
NE Alabama
Abbhudson
6 point
|
6 point
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 814
NE Alabama
|
I think that states should 100 percent manage their resources for the vast usage to be limited to residents only on public land. ALABAMA SHOULD VASTLY limit NR hunting all they can on both private and state owned props.
This is just better for the regular guy. However, on fed property inside of state there should be equal non resident and resident access in my opinion. You want the state to dictate who can hunt on privately owned lands? That seems like the 1st step down a very slippery slope.
|
|
|
|
