|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
57 registered members (CrappieMan, BC_Reb, DoubleShoalsJR, BradB, CAL, Joe4majors, dustymac, Bread, sportrep, NFHunter, Holcomb, TEM, roll_tide_hunts, mdavis, snakebit, gman, BrentsFX4, Narrow Gap, curt99rsv, Jbf, Jotjackson, filespinner, OlTimer, 7x57_Mauser, outdoorguy88, brett.smith, dirtwrk, roosterbob, Alb, Solothurn, Exhoosier, corvettedad123, !shiloh!, Teacher One, Chiller, Tree Dweller, Gobl4me, ParrotHead89, Parker243, Bowfish, hamma, cartervj, Bustinbeards, rahoovie, kpswihart, BamaBoHunter, Chaser357, Wapiti55, Eutaw, Dragfan66, kyles, RareBreed, 5 invisible),
1,251
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Strange or Moore
[Re: Rmart30]
#2231648
09/20/17 01:55 AM
09/20/17 01:55 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,944
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
bill
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 23,944
Clarksville, TN /Greenville, ...
|
Strange has literally killed his campaign with the negative Moore ads. Not one single ad has mentioned that Strange was a lobbyist for 20 plus years. Thats the consensus from most everyone Ive heard talking about the race. Luther probably would have been a walk in if not for the adds coming out, and him bailing from any talk radio interviews. There is a reason politicians go negative in their campaigns. It works incredibly well. It makes a lot of people uncomfortable but data shows it is a very effective strategy.
"Political debate: when charlatans come together to discuss their principles"
-
Bauvard
|
|
|
|
