|
|
|
|
Gun
by Snuffy. 05/10/24 11:43 AM
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
22 registered members (mossyback, JAT, Fedex 1, jchurch, n2deer, msims767, CreekCrosser, BayedUp, deadeye48, 25-20, BC_Reb, dave260rem!, Ike McCaslin, RCHRR, coosabuckhunter, SouthBamaSlayer, OutdoorsAL, EricS, Gobble4me757, sw1002, bhammedic84, 1 invisible),
1,410
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Exclusion Cage pics
[Re: bambam32]
#2068834
03/24/17 05:04 PM
03/24/17 05:04 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,231 Central Alabama
Yelp softly
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,231
Central Alabama
|
This would be a good opportunity to do a soil sample and see if there is a correlation to what you're observing. I believe animals can tell the difference in plots that are more nutritious. Science tells us that plots with the proper pH are better able to utilize the nutrients in the soil and should be more nutritious.
If soil tests on these plots don't reveal a correlation then your answer lies elsewhere. Maybe the plots being used heavily are closer to prime bedding areas. Either way, you've got some pieces to an interesting puzzle. If you piece it together, it could pay off in the future.
"When there was no fowl, we ate crawdad, when there was no crawdad, we ate sand."
"YOU ATE SAND!" - Raising Arizona
|
|
|
|