What about a property where you can't put in a greenfield/summer plot but want to put a feeder in the most central part of the property to entice deer to hang around and move through your property and your closest stand is 200-300 yards from feeder? Would that be acceptable for the anti-bait crowd?
Maybe that was the intent of the regulation for those that had a supplemental feeding program versus those that want a pile of corn or bait just out of site and/or off the edge of the foodplot.
As I recall "hunting" over "bait" as defined by the State did not change. The only thing that changed was from the continual moaning from those that could not define what "area" was so they appealed to the almighty government to come up with a fix so they could work on how to be just as confused and beg the almighty government (you know the ones that they wanted to fix the first "problem") to "fix" their problem again! What will be the next problem that will need to be fixed be with more regulations and laws??
Shoe leather and smarts will kill a lot more deer than posting about how wrong it is not being able to bait deer on an internet thread. Just my 2 cents, carry on!
