|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
96 registered members (JohnG, DoeNut, coosabuckhunter, TurkeyJoe, low wall, DThrash, !shiloh!, dwaugh, bamaeyedoc, therealhojo, Raspy, RCHRR, HDS64, BCLC, Blindluck, woodduck, 10 POINT, odocoileus, Paxamus, Shotts, MS_Hunter, Bustinbeards, Okatuppa, Eutaw, Frankie, Wadenthebushes, FreeStateHunter, JPFlier, Birdman83, BamaFan64, Bruno, OutdoorsAL, mcninja, wareagle22, Ditchdigger, Whiskey9, dave260rem!, Engine5, booner, twaldrop4, BigEd, Joe4majors, jmj120, BACK40, Davyalabama, CNC, Johnal3, UA Hunter, Tree Dweller, mw2015, NotsoBright, mopar, jdstephen44, AU7MM08, dawgdr, Mbrock, sanderson, Troutgreen, 300gr, foldemup, Moose24, cchoque93, Ron A., sloughfoot, Booger, Livintohunt19, kyles, Garndawg, Rmart30, Narrow Gap, Doeslayer44, mzzy, Gobble4me757, m2ruger, Frogeye, Peach, AJones, AUtgr, quailman, JD_Bowhunter1976, WDE, Exhoosier, Hunter454, 13 invisible),
1,268
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: "Stop and Frisk" is unconstitutional
[Re: Atoler]
#1858937
09/27/16 03:44 PM
09/27/16 03:44 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 NW Alabama
R_H_Clark
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
|
Just so I'm clear, are we talking about Terry Stops? Supreme Court already ruled on that and they are fine or are we talking about just some random stop and frisk with not articulable reasonable suspicion? I've never heard of a court thinking that was OK and if it ever came up I think the Terry case pretty well lays it out. No, this policy was requiring no reasonable suspicion. Terry V. Ohio already covers this. That matter was asked and answered years ago and shouldn't be an issue unless The Supreme Court sees a reason to revisit it. I guess you are missing the point. As you say, it's already outlined as unconstitutional. Yet, wrap your head around this, trump is a proponent of trampling your constitutional rights, and Hillary wasn't............he wants the stop and frisk that was ruled unconstitutional in New York. Maybe it's going to be readdressed in his term if he wins.... Of coarse, Hillary is a woman of her word. Her word is whatever she thinks you want to hear. Trump just says whatever the first thing is to pop in his mind. Truth is the president doesn't decide this issue one way or the other.
|
|
|
|