Just so I'm clear, are we talking about Terry Stops? Supreme Court already ruled on that and they are fine or are we talking about just some random stop and frisk with not articulable reasonable suspicion? I've never heard of a court thinking that was OK and if it ever came up I think the Terry case pretty well lays it out.
No, this policy was requiring no reasonable suspicion.
Terry V. Ohio already covers this. That matter was asked and answered years ago and shouldn't be an issue unless The Supreme Court sees a reason to revisit it.
I guess you are missing the point. As you say, it's already outlined as unconstitutional. Yet, wrap your head around this, trump is a proponent of trampling your constitutional rights, and Hillary wasn't............he wants the stop and frisk that was ruled unconstitutional in New York. Maybe it's going to be readdressed in his term if he wins....
