|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
50 registered members (CrappieMan, sw1002, Sandmtnslayer, Teacher One, Recovered, Peach, brianr, Fl Panhandler, CAL, Bandit635, PourIron12, leroycnbucks, wk2hnt, eclipse829, Herdbull, hyco, Whiskey9, CatfishJunkie, DoeNut, Bread, AJones, Hunting15, Tupi, IMISSALDEER, Jwillbucks, gog1015, TEM, kyles, Parker243, Floorman1, JohnG, Kelly_123, Shmoe, JA, BPI, TDog93, fur_n_feathers, Obsession, m2ruger, capehorn24, biglmbass, Holcomb, DuckDown11, Thread Killer, !shiloh!, OlTimer, 4 invisible),
1,115
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: .223 vs .308 for a hog gun
[Re: Remington270]
#1763139
06/17/16 08:20 AM
06/17/16 08:20 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,766
Lower AL
k bush
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,766
Lower AL
|
Will .223 work ? Yes. Is it the best choice- No. Doubt very many fall close to the shot. If this is not a problem or you don't mind looking for them go ahead with the .223. I killed a boat load of small hogs with a bolt action .22 hornet.
Second shots are definitely possible, even with a bolt action.
If you need an excuse to buy a .308 on an AR platform then this is good a reason as any.
"Cull" is just another four letter word...
|
|
|
|
