|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
135 registered members (Parker243, 1hunter, Narrow Gap, IDOT, desertdog, Turkey, sw1002, PikeRoadHunter, Big Buck Video, BullMountain, jwalker77, Reaper, canvasback, BobK, need2hunt, scrape, Floorman1, Driveby, fr8-shkr, MAG, Gobble4me757, cartervj, BentBarrel, lukecc, Kang, blade, NWFJ, sj22, Turkey Petter, just_an_illusion, Beer Belly, BuckRidge17, GoldenEagle, Claims Rep., Young20, smallgame, 163dm, GomerPyle, Uokman2014, capehorn24, Dubie, gwstang, dirtwrk, Justice, gatorbait154, CNC, DGAMBLER, RayDog, CrappieMan, sawdust, cbs, Rainbowstew, Bankheadhunter, BCLC, Nowlide, 2 ducks, MarksOutdoors, BigA47, cullmanbamafan, Mdees, Remington270, BOFF, specialk, dtmwtp, sanderson, coldtrail, Okalona, BPI, CB5121, Skinner, SEWoodsWhitetail, RCHRR, icducks, Rolloverdave, jhardy, Doeslayer44, Cactus_buck, bambam32, montoyafan, RidgeRanger, treemydog, Auburn1716, CouchNapper, JLMiller, scrubbuck, Jwillbucks, Chaser357, giftedkiller, RikkiV, oldbowhunter, Gunpowder, outdoorguy88, Pwyse, Warhead, Fullthrottle, abolt300, LongBeards29, XVIII, AU338MAG, Wapiti55, MikeP, 300gr, Tailwalk7, fladeerhntr, Rockhound, donia, TEM, Recovered, cdaddy14, Turkeyneck78, 4ssss, cch, Mansfield, Red Fox, Snuffy, znix123, Frogeye, kyles, weatherby, hue, hyco, Gunner211, johnv, Rickster, HappyHunter, Buck-bomb, 9 invisible),
1,298
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: HERE IS THE CORN RULE. CUT AND DRY
[Re: yotetrapper]
#1527650
11/19/15 08:21 AM
11/19/15 08:21 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,361
mman
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,361
|
At some point in the past 49er posted a picture of a memo that our Chief sent him which explained why plain white salt is allowed for deer. The reason is that in 1975 the legislature amended 9-11-245 and they were going to put the exception to allow the hunting of deer over salt in 9-11-244, but this was inadvertently left out. So our department honored the intent of the legislature to allow the hunting of deer over plain white salt.
Trophy rocks are a rock salt. Therefore legal.
Serious question. Since the law did not change, by what authority did your department change or ignore the existing law? I'm sure there are lots of things they were going to put in various laws, but since they were omitted, they are not binding. Hunting over salt is still illegal according to the law, but your department has basically published that it will not enforce the law as it is written??? Shouldn't your department just enforce the laws that are written and let the legislature change it if they want to or if they made a mistake???
|
|
|
|
