|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
139 registered members (YellaLineHunter, imadeerhntr, Sgiles, Offshore, BearBranch, Fedex 1, T Bone, Auburn1716, auman, Dixiepatriot, Buckshot77, scrape, gwstang, JAT, baitstop, MikeP, CNC, sj22, BigEd, stuball, leroycnbucks, Steve Ditchkoff, football1957, Chancetribe, JohnnyLoco, El_Matador, bug54, johnmcgowan, low wall, Scout10, M48scout, jhardy, Ridge Life, fish251, GATA87, jwalker77, Chaser357, beetrapper, burbank, Floorman1, Ray_Coon, lefthorn, CrappieMan, Chiller, Rainbowstew, CKyleC, Bamarich2, donia, Whild_Bill, Joe4majors, crenshawco, Mbrock, CrimsonWSM, Shmoe, coldtrail, brushwhacker, Tailwalk7, ALMODUX, ALDawg, Jstocks, PastorJack, BCLC, SEWoodsWhitetail, Austin1, smallgame, Hammertime7v2, Wildboar14, BhamFred, Ron A., Hotrod20, Beer Belly, StateLine, canvasback, Gunner211, top cat, BOFF, quailman, alhawk, jellyhead11, AU7MM08, HollerHunter, hhsdc78, bamabug, Birdman83, hallb, skoor, ImThere, canine933, cdaddy14, jw706, BamaFan64, Luxfisher, jprice, AU338MAG, woodduck, headshot, Bustinbeards, Young20, Reaper, Ben Downs, AU coonhunter, doublefistful, Gunpowder, Sully, DuckDown11, rrice0725, Turkey Petter, SouthBamaSlayer, Raven, RCHRR, catdoctor, montoyafan, mathews prostaff, robinhedd, brett.smith, booner, Cactus_buck, 000buck, ultratec00, Downwind, Morris, Tupi, jake44, doc bar, russellb, PourIron12, 13 invisible),
1,057
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: dinosaurs?
[Re: 300Ruger]
#1370626
06/17/15 06:05 AM
06/17/15 06:05 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,685
West Florida
westflgator
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,685
West Florida
|
Carbon deteriorates at a constant rate.
To pretend that carbon dating is a fact of science is misguided. There are many many questions surrounding the accuracy of carbon dating. There has been an every increasing list of things dated to be millions of years old that have since been found to be not nearly as old as dated by this method. One is the dinosaur bone that was found to contain soft tissue. Which is another rule of science which is in conflict with the carbon dating. Soft tissue cannot (according to science) remain in that condition for millions of years. Instead it appears to be thousands of years old not millions. This is just one example of many...
|
|
|
|
