Y'all keep on talking about limiting people based on acreage or how many deer someone "needs" or "don't need" and somesuch ... it'll come back to bite you in the ass.

Just keep on. It ain't never good enough. Unlimited does and three bucks ... 10 does and two bucks ... four does and 1 buck but a few extra does if you get on the program. Before long seven does is too many and someone "don't need" that many because they only have 302 acre and hell, anyone knows you only "need" to have a few and besides ...

Indiana, which has a good bit of open land, has a 1-buck limit. Their population isn't gigantic. Hunters there are bitching now about the proposal to allow rifles - HORRORS! RIFLES!! - because hunters "don't need a rifle" to kill a deer.

Ohio has giant bucks and they're bitching like little girls. Kentucky has big bucks and a 1-buck limit and I hear their hunters complaining about their DNR.

No one ever is satisfied.