MT, it is obivious to me that you are having as much fun with this forum as I am.

However your opinion does matter, as do all of ours.

Please explain how you would prosecute this case if you were the DA.

Please explain how you can determine BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT that he was hunting.

I think you will find that if indeed he was hunting BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT, then we are all hunting from the road if we have a loaded gun while driving home. Or we are hunting at night if we walk back to our truck with a loaded gun.

I agree it seems pretty simple. Unload your gun. You are not hunting. However he has the Consitutional Right to a loaded gun. IF A LOADED GUN CONSITUTES HUNTING, THEN IT SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN THE DEFINITION OF "HUNTING"

Make me believe your argument. And I will shut up. Yea I have a hard on for the GW's right now. I got a stupid ticket. But I really think that this ticket is pushing a major VIOLATION of our rights. YOU GIVE A INCH AND THEY TAKE A MILE.

anyway since we are having so much fun with this. Give it a try. OH AND PLEASE REMEMBER, WE ARE HAVING FUN WITH THIS. BUCKY IS NOT.