|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
37 registered members (Offshore, Jotjackson, low wall, Paint Rock 00, Obsession, kpswihart, GHTiger10, hamma, UABCPA, Bronco 74, seapro19, mossyback, Dragfan66, Flyliner, bamafarmer, OutdoorsAL, brassmagnet, Chaser357, Richard Cranium, Tree Dweller, coosabuckhunter, hoggin, Geezer, BBD23, specialk, turfarmer, 7mmSTW, m97, russellb, CatHeadBiscuit, AUtgr, NotsoBright, Alb, TurkeyJoe, GomerPyle, 2 invisible),
812
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: I have always wondered...
[Re: quailman]
#1212730
01/04/15 08:53 AM
01/04/15 08:53 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,901
Awbarn, AL
CNC
Dances With Weeds
|
Dances With Weeds
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,901
Awbarn, AL
|
From what I've seen personally. Those that were corning before the new regulation still are. Those that never did still aren't.  That’s not what I’ve seen. I’ve seen lots of folks using it as the go ahead to fill up properties with corn feeders and then push the envelope to the limit on how close to hunt to them. It’s not really their fault though….it’s the fault of a bad rule. The 100 yard rule by default creates the 101 yard feeder and is just asking for conflict to be created. It puts the public in an awkward situation and in a way is almost enticing folks to get themselves in trouble. It should be done away with and made legal or illegal period.
Last edited by CNC; 01/04/15 08:54 AM.
We dont rent pigs
|
|
|
|
