Come on guys, you cannot tell me that you don't think there is reasonable doubt that he was not hunting.

I am jury, I look at his record. He is law abiding citizen his whole life. If he gets on the stand and tells me he was not hunting. WELL REASONABLE DOUBT.

You got to understand, his background to me is as good as the LEO's. This man fought for his country for over 20 years. He defended all of our rights.

And yall are going to sit here on this forum and say he is guilty when you don't know enough to say that.

I hope he wins his case. I really can't see how they can charge him with hunting unless he made a move to kill an animal. OK what if he was walking down the paved road trying to get back to his car. WAS HE HUNTING