Originally Posted By: 59Hunter
There is precedent the courts have to follow, but in the most general since: nothing. However, the language in this Amendment doesn't create that opportunity, it already exists. However, if the right is not declared a fundamental right, a lesser standard of review would be applicable, making your hypothetical easier for restrictions to be upheld.


So how has it not been eroded further already. It doesn't really make sense. It looks like if herd was an opening to defeat gun rights it would be happening. Just trying to make sense of this...