Originally Posted By: 59Hunter
There is precedent the courts have to follow, but in the most general since: nothing. However, the language in this Amendment doesn't create that opportunity, it already exists. However, if the right is not declared a fundamental right, a lesser standard of review would be applicable, making your hypothetical easier for restrictions to be upheld.


Thank you sir. That helps. I will likely vote for it then.


"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm."

George Orwell