|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 registered members (coosabuckhunter, TexasHuntress, Tree Dweller, jlbuc10, Frankie, 10mm),
1,090
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Boat Motor Selection
[Re: juice]
#2412472
02/19/18 01:22 PM
02/19/18 01:22 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,375 Jasper, AL
joshm28
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,375
Jasper, AL
|
I will add this about my mercruiser, it’s a 350. It will suck down 30 gallons in a hurry if the boat is loaded down heavy. I count on $100 in fuel costs anytime I go to the lake but I do ride a lot compared to most. The motor itself has been flawless however. I had a 350 in my previous wake boat. It was fuel injected but would drink gas something awful. We traded it in last year on one that has a 6.2L in it. It has 50 more HP but gets much better fuel economy. With a 60 gallon tank we can usually ride around for 2-3 weekends between fill ups. Bigger motors in boats almost always use less fuel because they don't have to work as hard.
|
|
|
|
|
|