on the case of the bakery owner in Colorado who refused to make a cake for gay guy's that sued him. I don't know all the details but I do see that this ruling will without a doubt shape our futures and more importantly our childrens future. please join me in prayer this morning to help the judge's to see this case for what it really is.

You gon make Perch mad.

that's easily done lol

This will be a huge First Amendment freedom of religion and freedom of speech case. If the SCOTUS rules in favor of the sodomites then the First Amendment freedom of religion (read Christianity) will be essentially dead. It will be an open field day against Christians and churches everywhere. Of course, THAT is a major part of the atheist Bolshevik liberal agenda.

There's also and angle the baker is using in the case. He claims he wouldn't make it on some kind of an artistic basis. His bakery is ARTISTIC something.

That is the bakers freedom of speech/expression angle.
But the freedom of religion issue is the biggest, most serious and most important.

Can atheists, homos, Satanists, etc. force a Christian to do their bidding against that person's Christian beliefs??

The Founding Fathers would have put a bullet in their head on the spot.

I think they are just hearing the arguments today, likely won't know the outcome for a while?? I think.

Yeah, lag time can be anywhere from a few weeks (not likely) to the Spring time or Summer.

Would be nice to see that turncoat traitor Kennedy retire or kick the bucket now so a real conservative can fill his spot sooner then later.

What pisses me off the most is the way the media is spinning this, saying he refused them service. He didn't refuse to sell them a cake. He refused to create a custom cake. HUGE, HUGE difference.

If Clinton had won, how many do you believe would have retired? At least two?

That whole thing is such a clusterf***.....both sides of this argument are morons.

If the baker wanted to cite Christian beliefs and morals to them, perhaps he/she should've considered offering to make the cake, and using it as an opportunity to truly witness to them. What they chose to do afterward is their decision. Even God Himself gives us the choice to follow and obey, or not.

At the same time, you'll never convince me that these turd same-sex couples don't intentionally seek out bakers that they KNOW will have a problem with it, just to make a point and stir chit up.

I think it is as wrong as it can be to refuse service to someone based on their race/sex/religion/etc, but I think it is equally wrong to legally FORCE someone to do something that is against their religious views.

Ultimately, their is no good answer to this one.

I don't think it is. Especially when your "service" is a celebration of something you don't believe in. I don't see anyone forcing Baptist preachers to "marry" a couple of men. I hope it stays that way.

....but the baker will 100% lose this case.

I think as a private individual or private owned business you ought to be able to deny service to anyone you damn well please. You don't like it take yer business somewhere else.

This

I 100% agree with you.....

Now, I think in most cases, it probably makes you an awful person, but I don't think the government should be able to force you or punish you.

He should have made the faggots a wedding cake!!

One of a naked WOMEN with big nipples!

probably

if the baker loses it will be because traitor Kennedy sides with the Marxist liberals like he did in the Obergfell sodomite marriage case.

That used to be the American way.
Wish we could get back to that.