|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 registered members (Showout, Floorman1, Pwyse, Ol’Tom, GHTiger10, gman, mopar, Remington270, trailertrash, green river 123, BigA47, twaldrop4, Hunting-231, Bowfish, 3Gs, Gobble4me757, AHolcomb, TurkeyJoe, Bronco 74, AustinC, rwh1, ALScott, RCHRR, Big Rack, Moose24, sj22, dustymac, Ridge Life, Jbf, dave260rem!, Colt1917, mdf, catdoctor, UA Hunter, Big Buck Video, courseup, outdoorguy88, 7PTSPREAD, AU coonhunter, Catbird, XVIII, bamaeyedoc, ALMODUX, Gav-n-Tn, BradB, mw2015, fur_n_feathers, Dean, M48scout, BCD, Shmoe, FreeStateHunter, Rainbowstew, BCLC, clayk, Bmyers142, jhardy, .308, Scout308, scrubbuck, top cat, desertdog, JustHunt, Jweeks, Turberville, IMISSALDEER, deadeye48, Atoler, CCC, IDOT, Woody1, Chiller, Tree Hanger, Morris, surgical_grade, Wildboar14, Tree Dweller, 8 invisible),
1,371
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Savage Lightweight Hunter?
[Re: ChrisAU]
#2081858
04/07/17 02:20 AM
04/07/17 02:20 AM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 NW Alabama
R_H_Clark
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
|
It would be easily around 5 lbs 12 oz with a 2.5-8x36 and a nylon sling, but that may be too light. Chris,picking a light rifle so you can use the scope you want without having a 10 pound package is a valid school of thought.As long as it balances and handles to your expectations,it doesn't matter what anyone thinks but you. Personally,I am finding that my 7 lb all up rifle is easier to shoot well than my 6 lb all up rifle.I just haven't yet decided if weight is the deciding factor or not.The heavier rifle fits me better and has a heavier barrel which won't heat up so quick.
|
|
|
|