|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 registered members (SouthBamaSlayer, Flyliner, Cactus_buck, Jay512, Rolloverdave, Backwards cowboy, Hunting-231, Justice, gman, outdoorguy88, 7PTSPREAD, sidehitter, Reaper, PourIron12, Solothurn, Hoytdad10, AustinC, 2walnuts, Kang, curt99rsv, booner, Gut Pile 32, Bustinbeards, Parker243, SuperSpike, AHolcomb, Dragfan66, Bamajoz, Jdkprp70, Zbrann, scrape, SC53, Andalusia, hyco, Irishguy, Ron A., crenshawco, Skullworks, 300gr, BayedUp, 9 invisible),
1,088
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Outboard cav question
[Re: Hevishot13]
#1878790
10/15/16 03:42 PM
10/15/16 03:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,540 Spanish Fort
ozarktroutbum
OP
10 point
|
OP
10 point
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 3,540
Spanish Fort
|
Explain to me what your consider optimal performance? That boats should run no more 23 mph. No porpoising. And raising the motor up two inches would help much on preventing hitting things in shallow water. Just think, once on plane in that boat, your drawing minimal water on the transom, none at the bow. You get within two inches of the gearcase with a stump, you'll find a higher one in just a second that will throw you out of the boat.
No porpoising at WOT, highest point of recommending RPMS, and top speeds around 23MPH, that will be optimal performance for that boat. What I am really wanting is to be able to go shallower and hopefully get a tad more speed. Right now with just me i get around 21 mph. I will try and post a pic up possibly tomorrow.
|
|
|
Re: Outboard cav question
[Re: ozarktroutbum]
#1886104
10/21/16 04:13 PM
10/21/16 04:13 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,823 North Alabama
Hevishot13
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,823
North Alabama
|
That looks like a 20" shaft motor on a 15 or 16" inch transom. If so, the motor isn't right for the boat. That's why you feel like your performance is suffering. Running it on a jackplate will not help it, you need an elevator. It will raise the motor higher on the transom, without scooting it away too much. A jackplate will scoot the motor too far back, putting the gearcase in the turbulence of the wash of the boat, causing overheating. I don't care how much performance you think you'll gain with a jackplate, over heat it and you'll put a rod through the cowling. John boats do not do well with a jackplate unless it's built with a pad or a step hull, which yours is not.
You need a 20" transom boat, or a 15" inch motor
Last edited by Hevishot13; 10/21/16 04:14 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Outboard cav question
[Re: Hevishot13]
#1886125
10/21/16 04:32 PM
10/21/16 04:32 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 12,918 Old Florida
Geno
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 12,918
Old Florida
|
That looks like a 20" shaft motor on a 15 or 16" inch transom. If so, the motor isn't right for the boat. That's why you feel like your performance is suffering. Running it on a jackplate will not help it, you need an elevator. It will raise the motor higher on the transom, without scooting it away too much. A jackplate will scoot the motor too far back, putting the gearcase in the turbulence of the wash of the boat, causing overheating. I don't care how much performance you think you'll gain with a jackplate, over heat it and you'll put a rod through the cowling. John boats do not do well with a jackplate unless it's built with a pad or a step hull, which yours is not.
You need a 20" transom boat, or a 15" inch motor
Whoever is happy will make others happy too. Anne Frank
|
|
|
Re: Outboard cav question
[Re: ozarktroutbum]
#1886225
10/21/16 05:41 PM
10/21/16 05:41 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,823 North Alabama
Hevishot13
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,823
North Alabama
|
That LOOKS like a short shaft on a 15" transom to me, hard to tell in that pic though.
What width is that boat, 48"? If it is, my advice would be to sell that 15 and go with a 25. In all honesty, that's gonna be the only way to safely give you the performance your looking for. The motor you have could sell for 1000-1200 dollars realistically, and you could use that towards a 25. There's a guy on here selling a 25 2-stroke yamaha that would be ideal on your boat if its a 1548. That would be the best thing to do in my opinion. May not be what you want to hear, but it's the truth.
If it's not a 1548, and is maxed at 15hp rated, your stuck with what you have, but just a warning, those clamps in your pic are not safely secured. That motor will come off in some point, you better bolt it through the transom
|
|
|
Re: Outboard cav question
[Re: ozarktroutbum]
#1886465
10/22/16 04:33 AM
10/22/16 04:33 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,823 North Alabama
Hevishot13
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,823
North Alabama
|
It's a 1546 rated for 25 hp. I have definitely thought about going to a 25! I know I would be happier with a 25. I'm glad you mentioned the clamps. I might just take that 2x2 off and put it back like it was. It's a great running motor. Just gotta decide if the juice is worth the squeeze. Besides being a little underpowered I don't have any complaints with it. get you a 25 buddy, that's what I would do. either a 2 stroke 25 yamaha, or a 2 stroke 25 Mercury, 1995-2001 era. Thise are two of the best little motors that have ever been made. I would rather have a 2-stroke over a 4 stroke for the weight difference. A 25 4 stroke yamaha will weigh around 170, where as a 2 stroke will weigh around 115. big difference in the weight on the transom. Less weight on the transom, the less it squats in the back, less it draws water, the faster it is to an extent. Plus the easier to get on and off by yourself. A 2 stroke has better hole shot than a 4, top end is almost the same, the only draw back is that it will use a tad more fuel, but you'll only get around a mile less distance compared to a 4 stroke. And their cheaper, but harder to find.
|
|
|
|