|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 registered members (Frankie, BobK, mopar, BAR1225, Chiller, M48scout, grundan, leroyb, metalmuncher, Dixiepatriot, BC_Reb, dustymac, MTeague, AUdeerhunter, tucker07, Stacey, dave260rem!, russellb, BamaFan64, IMISSALDEER, Reaper, Turkey_neck, BCLC, CeeHawk37, Dog, apolloslade, Jwoods32, Catbird, pvillehunter, desertdog, C3SEAST, Turkeyneck78, mcninja, quickshot, GoldenEagle, lckrn, Driveby, Claims Rep., treemydog, Jwbfx4, JLMiller, LongBeards29, Grokamole, 2 invisible),
800
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Bowtech BT-X 31
[Re: flounderpounder]
#1661289
02/22/16 06:44 PM
02/22/16 06:44 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 16,967 Madison
BowtechDan
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 16,967
Madison
|
Glad you posted the speed rating. I checked out Bowtech's site the day they were to reveal the 2016 models and the specs of the BT-X were alot less. Then I went back to their site the other day and the BT-X has much better performance numbers now. I may have to choose between the BT-X and the Prodigy now.
Nathan Carl Goff 19 Sept 2016 - 14 Jan 2017.
|
|
|
|