Velvet
by swamp_fever2002. 05/02/24 06:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
9 registered members (coosabuckhunter, Holcomb, JAT, oldknight, dave260rem!, MS_Hunter, BamaGuitarDude, bhammedic84, MC21),
735
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Kansas Baiting
[Re: Gobl4me]
#3960942
08/19/23 02:50 PM
08/19/23 02:50 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,595 Tuscaloosa Co.
N2TRKYS
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,595
Tuscaloosa Co.
|
If I were worried about my turkey numbers…….the first thing I do is ban hunting over bait. Makes zero sense to allow it to continue. I’ve heard a podcast reference a study that showed zero difference in the amount and ease of kill between hunters that baited and hunters that didn’t. So, it may not be that cut and dry.
83% of all statistics are made up.
|
|
|
Re: Kansas Baiting
[Re: N2TRKYS]
#3960954
08/19/23 03:28 PM
08/19/23 03:28 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,127 Right behind you
Mbrock
Fancy
|
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,127
Right behind you
|
If I were worried about my turkey numbers…….the first thing I do is ban hunting over bait. Makes zero sense to allow it to continue. I’ve heard a podcast reference a study that showed zero difference in the amount and ease of kill between hunters that baited and hunters that didn’t. So, it may not be that cut and dry. That study would be absolute crap then.
|
|
|
Re: Kansas Baiting
[Re: Mbrock]
#3960960
08/19/23 03:47 PM
08/19/23 03:47 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,595 Tuscaloosa Co.
N2TRKYS
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,595
Tuscaloosa Co.
|
If I were worried about my turkey numbers…….the first thing I do is ban hunting over bait. Makes zero sense to allow it to continue. I’ve heard a podcast reference a study that showed zero difference in the amount and ease of kill between hunters that baited and hunters that didn’t. So, it may not be that cut and dry. That study would be absolute crap then. I guess we can all pick and choose which studies are crap.
83% of all statistics are made up.
|
|
|
Re: Kansas Baiting
[Re: N2TRKYS]
#3961001
08/19/23 05:29 PM
08/19/23 05:29 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,127 Right behind you
Mbrock
Fancy
|
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,127
Right behind you
|
If I were worried about my turkey numbers…….the first thing I do is ban hunting over bait. Makes zero sense to allow it to continue. I’ve heard a podcast reference a study that showed zero difference in the amount and ease of kill between hunters that baited and hunters that didn’t. So, it may not be that cut and dry. That study would be absolute crap then. I guess we can all pick and choose which studies are crap. Do you honestly believe the way you worded the results of the study are reflective of an unbiased scientifically valid study with accurate results in regards to the ease of killing TURKEYS? If so, then yes, I can choose to throw it out entirely if they concluded there to be zero difference in ease of kills between those baiting and those not, because it would be entirely false.
|
|
|
Re: Kansas Baiting
[Re: Mbrock]
#3962279
08/21/23 06:49 PM
08/21/23 06:49 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,982 Satsuma
kodiak06
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,982
Satsuma
|
If I were worried about my turkey numbers…….the first thing I do is ban hunting over bait. Makes zero sense to allow it to continue. I’ve heard a podcast reference a study that showed zero difference in the amount and ease of kill between hunters that baited and hunters that didn’t. So, it may not be that cut and dry. That study would be absolute crap then. I agree for down there. Up here in Oregon/Wa, you call they come. I called in a few in Idaho by mouth while scouting. I think it's due to season structures and hunter numbers. More land as well.
|
|
|
|