Is refusing to give the evidence to the media but claims she has the goods

Powell: Well one of the most impressive pieces of evidence is the affidavit of the young military officer who saw it all done and was there when it was created. He knows exactly how it works. He was briefed on it.And many other people are talking everyday about how it worked, we’ve got Eric Kumar, as you said admitting on tape that he rigged the elections for Biden, and hated Trump. We’ve got their social media posts. We’ve got all kinds of evidence that is mathematically irrefutable by experts, including three professors at Princeton. And it all proves the same thing, the evidence of individual poll watchers who saw votes come in, saw the machines manipulated, the machines are never supposed to be hooked up to the internet, at least 30 of them were according to a published article that’s already out. That’s an egregious breach of election law in itself, that should never have happened, that causes automatically, that should automatically invalidate anything coming out of those machines in every state that happened in, if not across the country because they can change everything as they’re watching it.

Tucker was all butt hurt about it last night.

Social media post, taped statements, mathematically blah, blah, breaches by poll workers.....more talk. Would like to see some/any proof. Not asking for them to play all their cards but one or two pieces of REAL evidence would be nice. I blame soccer. The suburbs have grown more and more blue as the popularity of soccer has grown among mother’s who believe football is too dangerous for their little cupcake. That's right it is all the fault of soccer.

She says she has 100s of affidavits coming in.

"I don't even know what our affidavit count is," she added. "Rudy has one set. And I have another. And then we share them with each other. So we haven't even had time to read all the affidavits that our lawyers have collected."

Why share your discovery with the media who will distort and censor it ?
Good call. Let that Jenna chick come out and give em' what fer' again.

While I fully agree that the Dems cheated and yes there is evidence of that, Miss Powell is going to need more proof than affadavits from poll workers and people familiar with the software, if she is planning on having the Supreme Court step in, and over, these states to invalidate and stay their ability to cast their electoral votes. The supreme court does not want to be the one to decide this election and has historically dropped back and punted when put on the spot. All 9 judges know that the country will burn if they reverse Biden's win. 4 will vote to uphold it, regardless of any evidence presented because 3 are good loyal demtards and Roberts is blackmailed or bought by the dems. None of the other 5 can afford to let their clutch slip and unless she absolutely has Dominion nailed to the wall on the vote switching, if I had to bet, I'm betting at least one of the 5 does slip. Fact of the matter is that after 4 yrs of this democrats in the streets BS, they are scared of what the Dems will do. They know the republicans will be pissed, but we wont go burning cities down and start beating the elderly down in the streets. Fact is they are scared of the democrats and what they may do if they dont get their way and every bit of this, including the recent rioting and looting, was 100% planned by the dems for this exact use as a future intimidation tactic.

All counting in swing states stopped with Trump winning, then when counting started again Trump goes behind. Why did counting stop all at the same time?

She'd be an idiot to reveal any evidence to the communist media.

So what do these affidavits include? Witness testimony? Let's get after it. And when we're done, let's prosecute every SOB that testified that they saw cheating. Oh wait, that's what will drag this out forever, the deal making and immunity for all the witnesses. I agree that they cheated, whether it was enough to affect the outcome? I dont know? I hope they prove it to be true. But I don't have a lot of confidence in most of them because, the Clinton's are still walking around free.

Had a lawyer friend today say you never, ever, ever give your evidence out prior to the trial. This is common place in the courtroom. So why is the media saying, "Show me the proof.." is beyond me. They (Trump Legal Team) gave you basically what their opening statement will be. With that said, there is plenty out there if your willing to look for it. You won't find it on MSM or by using Google as your web browser. Some examples are the live data tabulations from Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, the dominion manual, etc., etc. Just the way the Dems, MSM and Big Tech are acting speaks VOLUMES to me. They sure weren't talking about UNITY and no such thing as ELECTION MEDDLING four years ago. I really believe this thing will go to the SCOTUS and then on to the House where Amendment 12 will be exercised. If it doesn't get dealt with now, we are in SERIOUS trouble. If not nipped in the bud now, it will be welcome to COMMUNIST AMERICA.

Nothing to gain by giving the media any of it. I would tell them to go hug a root

SidneyPowell1 says The servers was confiscated the other day and she’s hearing it was our forces that got them.

If it was our forces that got the servers, and Trump is president, and Sidney Powell is Trump's lead counsel in all this, you think that maybe, just maybe, she'd know for certain if it was her team that had the servers. She'd be the one coordinating the examination and analysis of those servers to gather evidence to back up her Dominion software claims. Im not trying to throw cold water on this by any means but there are lots of unanswered questions. There was a rumor that the CIA was the group behind getting the servers and had the army assist with the mission. That right there scares the crap out of me because the CIA has been, and most likely still is, the group pulling most of the strings behind the coup to get Trump out of office.

She never said what servers were confiscated, were they were now, how many were ceased or were they were ceased from, nothing but another "statement" from her. Like abolt said lots of unanswered questions.

Cant argue with you on that

She has nothing but affidavits from what I heard. No clue about the servers or machines and no idea why no one has confiscated them. Those machines are the only thing that can get this to the scotus and she has no hard evidence of them being used in a fraudulent manner. I was highly dissappointed to hear her answet questions.

So many dumbasses here. You give your case in court, not on social media. Grow up. The experts are handling this and it is above some of your 5th grade educations.Stop second guessing everything, it is way above your paygrade. If Sidney Powell says it, you can take it to the bank. She is a very intelligent, respected and serious lawyer. This is not a game and She nor Lin Wood would be wasting their time if there wasn't anything there. Trump 2020

Perch what I am saying is that she said she has no evidence or posession of the machines or software that could be used to cheat. I have no doubt she has the affidavits and accounts of fraud but the supreme court wont look at that imo. They need proof of trump votes being swapped to biden and from what she said she does not have it.

You present your case to a court IF you have a case. So far she has no evidence or control of the machines or software that could be used in court.