|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
11 registered members (BearBranch, CreekCrosser, hallb, DoeNut, Cactus_buck, JHL, hyco, Zzzfog, 3 invisible),
985
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Scope Comparisons
[Re: UncleHuck]
#3208135
09/02/20 10:58 AM
09/02/20 10:58 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 18,178
North AL
AU338MAG
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 18,178
North AL
|
I'll throw another vote for the Swarovski Z5.
Used Swarovski PV scopes and some S&B would be well under your budget, and are outstanding glass. Not likely to have an exposed turret, though. We have a number of Swarovski and Schmidt-Bender, but have only bought two new, both for my wife.
Huck and I both have tested a bunch of scopes over the years. Swarovskis and S&B top the list for hunting rifles imo. I think I’ve got 6 rifles now with either of those two manufacturers for glass. All those rifles utilize MPBR or ballistics reticles for distance. My two long range rifles (1K yards) Have Zeiss and Burris XTR scopes as they are better suited for dialing. No one makes a good aftermarket turret for Swarovskis and I’m not a fan of their ballistic turrets. They are repeatable and accurate but not quick like the Burris Turret. My S&B is a 2-6x42 sitting on a .444 marlin. It’s probably one of the best low light s op I’ve ever used and with the heavy post reticle I could shoot accurately at midnight lol. If you ever decide to part with that S&B, I'm your man. 😀 Wes, if I ever find another one, I'll call you first. Only scopes I own that are in the same league as S&B or Swarovski are older Kahles Helia and any older Zeiss Diavari from West Germany with the T* coatings. I have a Kahles Helia S 3-12 x 56 that is so old that it has a blued steel tube. I have killed pigs with it over an hour after sundown. I've got a couple of those old Zeiss scopes and they are great in low light. One time I took two rifles to a stand, one with a Zeiss conquest 4.5x14x44 and one with an old 3x9x36. I shot one doe and stayed in the stand until another group came into the field at last light. Tried to see them with the conquest but could barely see their shape so grabbed the other gun and could still see clearly.
Dying ain't much of a living boy...Josey Wales
Molon Labe
|
|
|
Re: Scope Comparisons
[Re: joshm28]
#3208196
09/02/20 12:46 PM
09/02/20 12:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,152
GA
UncleHuck
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,152
GA
|
I’m a big fan of the Older Swarovski Habicht series. For the money there’s not much out there better I have 5 total Yup. I have to set an alarm on my phone to let me know when legal shooting hours are. I killed a 7 point at 125 yards within a few seconds of legal hours 2 years ago on a solid cloudy evening in January. The two guys I was with had left their fields because they couldn't see any longer.
|
|
|
Re: Scope Comparisons
[Re: AU338MAG]
#3208374
09/02/20 03:43 PM
09/02/20 03:43 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 184
Pelham, Alabama
280REM
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 184
Pelham, Alabama
|
A Swarovski 3.5x18x44mm is a more versatile scope IMHO. Lower power setting gives larger field of view for woods hunting and 18X is plenty of magnification for long shots to 500 yards and beyond. If you don't practice shooting and know your ballistics very well you have no business taking a shot at an animal at those ranges anyhow.
Illuminated reticles have never done much for me. At last light they wash out the target even on the lowest setting. If I can't see the reticle, it's too late to be shootin. I gots me one of them scopes on one of my guns! I like it.
|
|
|
Re: Scope Comparisons
[Re: Big Game Hunter]
#3210788
09/05/20 05:23 AM
09/05/20 05:23 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,463
Mississippi
riflenut
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,463
Mississippi
|
Buy the Swarovski in the classifieds.
Don’t worry about the BT because under 95% of hunting situations the standard plex reticle will be fine. I'd do what BGH said and buy the Swaro in the classifieds. 
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson
"I ask, who are the militia? They consist of now of the whole people, except a few public officers." George Mason
|
|
|
Re: Scope Comparisons
[Re: joshm28]
#3215100
09/10/20 07:34 AM
09/10/20 07:34 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 11
Alabama
Tikka Phil
spike
|
spike
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 11
Alabama
|
I have a Leupold fire dot VX5HD 3x15x44 just bought this year. Lite weight and bright. I went to Mark's outdoors to compare scopes just by looking through them in the store the vx5 was a lot Better than a vx3 50mm and Better than a Zeiss to me. I didn't buy the scope there Sport optics out of Louisiana had a sale with free shipping. Got it cheaper than Mark's before taxes.
Last edited by Tikka Phil; 09/10/20 07:37 AM.
|
|
|
|
(Custom).JPG)
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/BbfbhSkL/fullsizeoutput-278c.jpg)
