Good bad and ugly?

I have a 6x24x50 V4 conquest. Good scope which tracks well with the turret. Good, but not Alpha level glass for lowlight, clarity is good. No complaints but I think there may be better options in the same price range, maybe the Leupold VX5 line. Swarovski Z5 scopes have better lowlight performance, but they cost a little more.

I

I have one and wouldn’t hesitate to buy another. You’ll be pleased with it.

Thanks guys. I currently have a leupold vx111 4.5x14.5 x50. On the zeiss I'm looking at a 6x24x50. Need more magnification , eyes getting older. Just curious if it's worth the change, leupold has been great for years.

In the price range of that scope, I think I would prefer a Swarovski Z5 3.5x18 or 5x25 for a hunting rifle.

Agreed. I ran a Z3 for years on my deer rifle and can’t remember looking down another scope that I thought looked better. That said I’m in the process of mounting a Nightforce SHV on a new .300WM and I’m pretty excited about how it looks/feels. I have some friends that have only used Zeiss ever and they’re not putting anything else on their gun. Committing to spending over $1k for a scope makes it hard not to end up with quality glass.

If I could get one for 480 new shipped here it's kinda hard to pass.

My conquest v4 6-24x50 is every bit as good as my Z5.

I wouldn't hesitate.

Thanks, ordering now, can get one for 480 total shipped here. Should be a step up from leupold vx3 , just curios how much of upgrade it actually is

That’s a great buy for that scope.