If everything he posted is the truth and is the only evidence presented, they need to appeal to the Alabama court of criminal appeals. I have personally never seen a Judge convict someone when there has been no evidence of a crime presented. If the facts are really what you say, that is not even circumstantial evidence of a crime.
A warrant should not have even been issued, thus the number of people doubting that they are getting the whole story. When you have a criminal defense lawyer (not surprisingly) saying there wasn't enough evidence, but then it is backed up by a retired GW and a retired police executive, it speaks strongly that there was not enough evidence from the information we were given.
