|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Iso
by AustinC. 05/21/24 05:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 registered members (Geezer, TexasHuntress, BAR1225, BCLC, XVIII, MidnightRider, Frankie, kodiak06, Okatuppa, BC_Reb, Ryano, ImThere, Gut Pile 32, CAL, Bankheadhunter, Okalona, Zbrann, Gobble4me757, Semo, 5 invisible),
1,207
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: 5.3 Sierra mpg?
[Re: extreme heights hunter]
#872861
02/21/14 09:35 AM
02/21/14 09:35 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,918
AL
hunterbuck
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,918
AL
|
2011 Z71 4x4 everything stock. I average 17+ in mixed city/hwy driving. Highway driving (not interstate), I can get 19.5-20 mpg. I don't drive like a bat out of hell and I only run non-ethanol fuel.
"You think I care? Roll Damn Tide"
Have you tried Google?
|
|
|
Re: 5.3 Sierra mpg?
[Re: ZHunt]
#873034
02/21/14 12:06 PM
02/21/14 12:06 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,720
Over yonder
extreme heights hunter
OP
Booner
|
OP
Booner
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,720
Over yonder
|
Sorry to go off on a slight tangent but I now drive a 2500 diesel and love it! I get a consistent 22 mph which is about like getting 17-18 mph considering the cost difference with gasoline. Not to mention diesel vehicles don't depreciate as quickly (or has a longer life) and needs about half the maintenance. In other words, I recommend them for long term cost savings. Short term is a different story. I agree except for the maintenance part
|
|
|
|
(Custom).JPG)