|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 registered members (BAR1225, Uokman2014, JAT, robinhedd, GoldenEagle, Whild_Bill, BCLC, Mossy, BACK40, Okatuppa, cullmanbamafan, Longtine, Lonster, BC_Reb, RidgeRanger, AMB, scrape, MikeP, Boathand, rhino21, Big Bore, sw1002, Semo, Moss, Tigger85, CatHeadBiscuit, johnv, Cutem, Gobble4me757, farmerjay, 7 invisible),
673
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Safety shoes
[Re: Cousneddy]
#4100341
03/12/24 09:38 PM
03/12/24 09:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,838
Hoover, AL
M48scout
12 point
|
12 point
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,838
Hoover, AL
|
Timberland Pros, light and comfortable for me. This is what I currently have. I only wear them sporadically, but they seem fine. I got them with a composite toe so that I could take them through airport security on day trips. They at least made an effort to make the insoles comfortable. Most brands seem to intentionally place thin rigid insoles in the shoes. I guess they know most people will change insoles out to their favorites and save money there.
|
|
|
|
