|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 registered members (brianr, kpswihart, AKB, TurkeyJoe, Boathand, johnv, capehorn24, PapaD, Crawfish, Chaser357, Skullworks, imadeerhntr, scrape, sawdust, Reaper, SC53, Moss, Etyson, 7PTSPREAD, Fedex 1, CAL, jaredhunts, Drycreek, Rolloverdave, RCHRR, bamabug, Narrow Gap, BCLC, janiemae, DuckDown11, CrimsonWSM, Gobl4me, Jweeks, 6 invisible),
401
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Bedding location vs feeding
[Re: Squadron77]
#4079267
02/07/24 02:52 PM
02/07/24 02:52 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 172
Alabama
RandanAL
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 172
Alabama
|
Very cool. Yea I've been looking at the Autel EVO II 640T. The Mavic seems like a better software package but you can get a used 640T for like $3k vs. $5k for the Mavic. Can't decide if springing for the more expensive would be worth it. I always wanted a drone just because of the photo video, then wanted one to drop baits for fishing, now adding the thermal technology may push me over the edge. The ability to check a massive amount of public quickly in the off season as just a way to somewhat narrow down scouting seems like a great benefit. I live pretty far from everything I hunt so the drone pays for itself in time saved scouting IMO.
Last edited by RandanAL; 02/07/24 02:53 PM.
|
|
|
|
