</a JR Holmes Oil Company </a Shark Guard Southeast Woods and Whitetail Mayer Insurance Services LLC
Aldeer Classifieds
4/0 copper wire
by Drycreek. 06/18/24 05:48 AM
ISO Bass Boat
by foxtrot. 06/17/24 06:54 PM
Expert Grill pellet Grill/Smoker NIB
by longshot. 06/17/24 10:56 AM
Dual Scrren dvd player BNIB
by Shaneomac2. 06/17/24 10:44 AM
Adjustavble trailer hitch BNIB
by Shaneomac2. 06/17/24 10:28 AM
Serious Deer Talk
Shooting Houses
by Beer Belly. 06/18/24 07:24 AM
Lake Martin Community Hunting Area?
by Morris. 06/16/24 04:04 PM
New Tracking Rules
by Ridge Life. 06/14/24 09:43 PM
Hunting Lease Insurance
by mw2015. 06/10/24 09:45 AM
Feeders and Hogs
by PYhunter. 06/09/24 10:27 AM
June
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
Land, Leases, Hunting Clubs
Ky rifle hunt for south AL or MS rut hunt
by todd w. 06/16/24 09:33 PM
University Lands
by clayk. 06/15/24 08:39 PM
Diamond Mountain Club
by Stoney. 06/09/24 08:30 PM
Hunting Club Jefferson/Tuscaloosa Line
by Austin1. 06/07/24 09:08 PM
Wayne county tn leases
by brushwhacker. 06/05/24 06:13 PM
Who's Online Now
95 registered members (Jmfire722, slippinlipjr, PikeRoadHunter, Turkey_neck, JohnnyLoco, WEMOhunter, GomerPyle, buck_buster, Dragfan66, Ray_Coon, Backwards cowboy, ken1970, BentBarrel, jawbone, abolt300, klay, Jotjackson, mcninja, Chaser357, leroyb, Shaneomac2, Rip Wheeler, PourIron12, William, RidgeRanger, ts1979flh, treemydog, CNC, Ben2, crenshawco, trlrdrdave, Ben Downs, Andalusia, biglmbass, NVM1031, odocoileus, Standbanger, Skillet, JoeBuck, BamaGuitarDude, beeline08, 7PTSPREAD, cdaddy14, Fullthrottle, Paddlejon, BPI, 3Gs, tenthlegionnaire, Bowfish, SouthBamaSlayer, Morris, KHOOKS, jhardy, gatorbait154, Overland, Ridgehunter36, MarksOutdoors, Fishduck, taggedout, hamma, Treelimb, canichols424, outdoorguy88, USeeMSpurs, just_an_illusion, Tree Hanger, Shane99, DEDTRKY, Bustinbeards, mossyback, bamapanic, CarbonClimber1, hunter84, Daveleeal, thayerp81, mikewhandley, foldemup, MC21, deerchop, mzzy, Lightfoot, Turkeyneck78, Driveby, Keysbowman, Turkey, gundoc, claybird, Jstocks, Mansfield, Frankie, 5 invisible), 295 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Archeological question #4014882
11/12/23 08:22 AM
11/12/23 08:22 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,754
blount county alabama
I
imadeerhntr Offline OP
14 point
imadeerhntr  Offline OP
14 point
I
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,754
blount county alabama
So a video with a Palestinian saying Israel wouldn’t allow them to dig to prove they were the original people there. Not sure if it’s BS or what. But you would think Israel would allow it to prove their case. I’m a supporter of Israel so don’t take this as a pro plo post. Because I still believe they are evil

Re: Archeological question [Re: imadeerhntr] #4014887
11/12/23 08:31 AM
11/12/23 08:31 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
Skinny Offline
GUVNER
Skinny  Offline
GUVNER
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
The archaeology of that region has been politicized since the early 1900's. Everytime there is a finding of any kind of significance it is used by the various interest groups to bolster their claims. Every country and religion and political organization do it and it annoys the piss out of archaeologists unless you are the archaeologist collecting the pay check. Dang Joseph's grave has been found at least a half dozen times. Evidence of Hebrew writing has been found on Sumerian tablets under pyramids in Egypt, that was later found out to be fraud. The Shroud of Turin is only about 400 years old and is a fake done by the Catholic church.
The Palestinians also know that an archaeological excavation can take years or decades just to find nothing significant to anybodies' cause so its a good stall tactic.


Never Trust Government

"You can be broke but you cant be poor." Ruthie-May Webster
Re: Archeological question [Re: imadeerhntr] #4014888
11/12/23 08:31 AM
11/12/23 08:31 AM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,540
northport
deadeye48 Offline
Booner
deadeye48  Offline
Booner
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,540
northport
Its ironic that Israel cant dig around the Temple mount either without the arabs going nutz


When I need expert advice I tend to talk to myself
The older I get the better I used to be
Re: Archeological question [Re: deadeye48] #4014890
11/12/23 08:35 AM
11/12/23 08:35 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
Skinny Offline
GUVNER
Skinny  Offline
GUVNER
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
Originally Posted by deadeye48
Its ironic that Israel cant dig around the Temple mount either without the arabs going nutz


Wouldn't matter anyway, there aint nothing to find there except an argument.


Never Trust Government

"You can be broke but you cant be poor." Ruthie-May Webster
Re: Archeological question [Re: Skinny] #4014896
11/12/23 08:45 AM
11/12/23 08:45 AM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,540
northport
deadeye48 Offline
Booner
deadeye48  Offline
Booner
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,540
northport
Originally Posted by Skinny
Originally Posted by deadeye48
Its ironic that Israel cant dig around the Temple mount either without the arabs going nutz


Wouldn't matter anyway, there aint nothing to find there except an argument.


Skinny do you remember when Arafat had the excavations done inside the dome ?
If I remember correctly the spoils dumped by them had artifacts from many nations throughout history


When I need expert advice I tend to talk to myself
The older I get the better I used to be
Re: Archeological question [Re: imadeerhntr] #4014901
11/12/23 08:51 AM
11/12/23 08:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 22,560
blount county alabama
jwalker77 Offline
Pumpkin
jwalker77  Offline
Pumpkin
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 22,560
blount county alabama
Likely some gentiles were there before Abraham ever went there. But it would be impossible for muslims to be there first because they were not on earth first.

Last edited by jwalker77; 11/12/23 08:52 AM.
Re: Archeological question [Re: deadeye48] #4014909
11/12/23 09:03 AM
11/12/23 09:03 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
Skinny Offline
GUVNER
Skinny  Offline
GUVNER
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
Originally Posted by deadeye48
Originally Posted by Skinny
Originally Posted by deadeye48
Its ironic that Israel cant dig around the Temple mount either without the arabs going nutz


Wouldn't matter anyway, there aint nothing to find there except an argument.


Skinny do you remember when Arafat had the excavations done inside the dome ?
If I remember correctly the spoils dumped by them had artifacts from many nations throughout history


Yup. Exactly as expected. Its the geographic center of the old World, just like Mexico City is the geographic center of the New World.
If you go dig at sites in Mexico City you can find stuff that is 4000 years old from Alaska and Argentina. It doesn't mean anything other than a non-local object was carried there from a far off place. Its like this computer I am on right now. It was built in China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Mexico, India, and some other places but its found in Alabama.


Never Trust Government

"You can be broke but you cant be poor." Ruthie-May Webster
Re: Archeological question [Re: imadeerhntr] #4014917
11/12/23 09:17 AM
11/12/23 09:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,540
northport
deadeye48 Offline
Booner
deadeye48  Offline
Booner
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,540
northport
Thats the point
It doesnt prove ownership of anything
It just proves someone was there at some point in history


When I need expert advice I tend to talk to myself
The older I get the better I used to be
Re: Archeological question [Re: Skinny] #4014980
11/12/23 11:03 AM
11/12/23 11:03 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,060
God's Country
B
bowhunter86 Offline
6 point
bowhunter86  Offline
6 point
B
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,060
God's Country
Originally Posted by Skinny
The archaeology of that region has been politicized since the early 1900's. Everytime there is a finding of any kind of significance it is used by the various interest groups to bolster their claims. Every country and religion and political organization do it and it annoys the piss out of archaeologists unless you are the archaeologist collecting the pay check. Dang Joseph's grave has been found at least a half dozen times. Evidence of Hebrew writing has been found on Sumerian tablets under pyramids in Egypt, that was later found out to be fraud. The Shroud of Turin is only about 400 years old and is a fake done by the Catholic church.
The Palestinians also know that an archaeological excavation can take years or decades just to find nothing significant to anybodies' cause so its a good stall tactic.


You have any evidence to back any of these claims beyond, “I’m an archeologist”? It’s apparent through the history of your post since the time I’ve been on this site that you have a resentment against any biblical archeology. The shroud is not a catholic relic… it wasn’t even under catholic control until very recently. All scientific evidence I’ve seen in no way points to it being new, or a forgery. Archeology is extremely interesting and I respect all in the field, but don’t make false claims under the guise of, I’m an archeologist… so my word is gospel.

Re: Archeological question [Re: jwalker77] #4014991
11/12/23 11:39 AM
11/12/23 11:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 26,086
Fayetteville TN Via Selma
jawbone Online content
Freak of Nature
jawbone  Online Content
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 26,086
Fayetteville TN Via Selma
Originally Posted by jwalker77
Likely some gentiles were there before Abraham ever went there. But it would be impossible for muslims to be there first because they were not on earth first.


Right. Since the lineage of the Jews and Muslims both go back to Abraham, they pretty much both are the same age.


Lord, please help us get our nation straightened out.
Re: Archeological question [Re: bowhunter86] #4015003
11/12/23 12:10 PM
11/12/23 12:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
Skinny Offline
GUVNER
Skinny  Offline
GUVNER
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
Originally Posted by bowhunter86
Originally Posted by Skinny
The archaeology of that region has been politicized since the early 1900's. Everytime there is a finding of any kind of significance it is used by the various interest groups to bolster their claims. Every country and religion and political organization do it and it annoys the piss out of archaeologists unless you are the archaeologist collecting the pay check. Dang Joseph's grave has been found at least a half dozen times. Evidence of Hebrew writing has been found on Sumerian tablets under pyramids in Egypt, that was later found out to be fraud. The Shroud of Turin is only about 400 years old and is a fake done by the Catholic church.
The Palestinians also know that an archaeological excavation can take years or decades just to find nothing significant to anybodies' cause so its a good stall tactic.


You have any evidence to back any of these claims beyond, “I’m an archeologist”? It’s apparent through the history of your post since the time I’ve been on this site that you have a resentment against any biblical archeology. The shroud is not a catholic relic… it wasn’t even under catholic control until very recently. All scientific evidence I’ve seen in no way points to it being new, or a forgery. Archeology is extremely interesting and I respect all in the field, but don’t make false claims under the guise of, I’m an archeologist… so my word is gospel.


I'm not against Biblical Archaeology at all, its a nice magazine. The majority it is directed at proving a hypothesis instead of refuting a hypothesis. So by standard, it does not follow the scientific method.
And the shroud is indeed a forgery. The C-14 evidence, the phytolith analysis, the neutron activation analysis, metallurgical analysis, XRF, and DNA analysis all are in agreement that it is a forgery. C-14 says it is 400-450 yrs old, phytolith anlaysis says the shroud is from central Italy, neutron activation says the various paints are from Italy, Spain, and France. Metallurgical analysis says the stuff that looks like blood are iron and lead based paint, XRF analysis says there is a good bit of chromium and cyanide in the paints, and DNA says that the stuff that looks like human blood is not blood at all but rather metal based paint, and the shroud is made of flax which is linen.


Never Trust Government

"You can be broke but you cant be poor." Ruthie-May Webster
Re: Archeological question [Re: jawbone] #4015027
11/12/23 01:04 PM
11/12/23 01:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 22,560
blount county alabama
jwalker77 Offline
Pumpkin
jwalker77  Offline
Pumpkin
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 22,560
blount county alabama
Originally Posted by jawbone
Originally Posted by jwalker77
Likely some gentiles were there before Abraham ever went there. But it would be impossible for muslims to be there first because they were not on earth first.


Right. Since the lineage of the Jews and Muslims both go back to Abraham, they pretty much both are the same age.

But, to be fair, Abraham was not a muslim. But i dont think theres any proof nobody was there before Abraham got there. I think its unlikely he was first. Likely some other human had pitched a tent there before him.

Re: Archeological question [Re: Skinny] #4015036
11/12/23 01:18 PM
11/12/23 01:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 951
AL
J
jhardy Online content
6 point
jhardy  Online Content
6 point
J
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 951
AL
Originally Posted by Skinny
Originally Posted by bowhunter86
Originally Posted by Skinny
The archaeology of that region has been politicized since the early 1900's. Everytime there is a finding of any kind of significance it is used by the various interest groups to bolster their claims. Every country and religion and political organization do it and it annoys the piss out of archaeologists unless you are the archaeologist collecting the pay check. Dang Joseph's grave has been found at least a half dozen times. Evidence of Hebrew writing has been found on Sumerian tablets under pyramids in Egypt, that was later found out to be fraud. The Shroud of Turin is only about 400 years old and is a fake done by the Catholic church.
The Palestinians also know that an archaeological excavation can take years or decades just to find nothing significant to anybodies' cause so its a good stall tactic.


You have any evidence to back any of these claims beyond, “I’m an archeologist”? It’s apparent through the history of your post since the time I’ve been on this site that you have a resentment against any biblical archeology. The shroud is not a catholic relic… it wasn’t even under catholic control until very recently. All scientific evidence I’ve seen in no way points to it being new, or a forgery. Archeology is extremely interesting and I respect all in the field, but don’t make false claims under the guise of, I’m an archeologist… so my word is gospel.


I'm not against Biblical Archaeology at all, its a nice magazine. The majority it is directed at proving a hypothesis instead of refuting a hypothesis. So by standard, it does not follow the scientific method.
And the shroud is indeed a forgery. The C-14 evidence, the phytolith analysis, the neutron activation analysis, metallurgical analysis, XRF, and DNA analysis all are in agreement that it is a forgery. C-14 says it is 400-450 yrs old, phytolith anlaysis says the shroud is from central Italy, neutron activation says the various paints are from Italy, Spain, and France. Metallurgical analysis says the stuff that looks like blood are iron and lead based paint, XRF analysis says there is a good bit of chromium and cyanide in the paints, and DNA says that the stuff that looks like human blood is not blood at all but rather metal based paint, and the shroud is made of flax which is linen.


Skinny done went all technical on us.

Re: Archeological question [Re: imadeerhntr] #4015042
11/12/23 01:26 PM
11/12/23 01:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
Skinny Offline
GUVNER
Skinny  Offline
GUVNER
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
He asked if there was evidence, so I shortly explained it. There are several books about all the evidence that the shroud is a fraud and a lot of ideas about why the fraud was created. Its one of the more successful archaeological frauds of all time, kinda like that 500 year old meteor that the Muslims like to touch at Mecca. Its just another damn meteor and we have one just like it right here in Alabama that actually hit a person so that makes ours a lot more cool.


Never Trust Government

"You can be broke but you cant be poor." Ruthie-May Webster
Re: Archeological question [Re: imadeerhntr] #4015045
11/12/23 01:30 PM
11/12/23 01:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 26,086
Fayetteville TN Via Selma
jawbone Online content
Freak of Nature
jawbone  Online Content
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 26,086
Fayetteville TN Via Selma
I'll just take this opportunity to point out that you don't need evidence if you have Faith.


Lord, please help us get our nation straightened out.
Re: Archeological question [Re: imadeerhntr] #4015047
11/12/23 01:30 PM
11/12/23 01:30 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 14,400
ArmPit of the south
D
DeerNutz0U812_ Offline
Booner
DeerNutz0U812_  Offline
Booner
D
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 14,400
ArmPit of the south
Well, you dont have to be such a ass-clown about it.... laugh...


Did you know that Beer Nutz are over a Dollar...and Deer Nutz are under a Buck...


Re: Archeological question [Re: jwalker77] #4015052
11/12/23 01:34 PM
11/12/23 01:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 26,086
Fayetteville TN Via Selma
jawbone Online content
Freak of Nature
jawbone  Online Content
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 26,086
Fayetteville TN Via Selma
Originally Posted by jwalker77
Originally Posted by jawbone
Originally Posted by jwalker77
Likely some gentiles were there before Abraham ever went there. But it would be impossible for muslims to be there first because they were not on earth first.


Right. Since the lineage of the Jews and Muslims both go back to Abraham, they pretty much both are the same age.

But, to be fair, Abraham was not a muslim. But i dont think theres any proof nobody was there before Abraham got there. I think its unlikely he was first. Likely some other human had pitched a tent there before him.

No Abraham was not a Muslim, or Palestinian. We can assume he was a Jew since we are told he was one of God's Chosen people.


Lord, please help us get our nation straightened out.
Re: Archeological question [Re: Skinny] #4015053
11/12/23 01:35 PM
11/12/23 01:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,540
northport
deadeye48 Offline
Booner
deadeye48  Offline
Booner
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 10,540
northport
Originally Posted by Skinny
Originally Posted by bowhunter86
Originally Posted by Skinny
The archaeology of that region has been politicized since the early 1900's. Everytime there is a finding of any kind of significance it is used by the various interest groups to bolster their claims. Every country and religion and political organization do it and it annoys the piss out of archaeologists unless you are the archaeologist collecting the pay check. Dang Joseph's grave has been found at least a half dozen times. Evidence of Hebrew writing has been found on Sumerian tablets under pyramids in Egypt, that was later found out to be fraud. The Shroud of Turin is only about 400 years old and is a fake done by the Catholic church.
The Palestinians also know that an archaeological excavation can take years or decades just to find nothing significant to anybodies' cause so its a good stall tactic.


You have any evidence to back any of these claims beyond, “I’m an archeologist”? It’s apparent through the history of your post since the time I’ve been on this site that you have a resentment against any biblical archeology. The shroud is not a catholic relic… it wasn’t even under catholic control until very recently. All scientific evidence I’ve seen in no way points to it being new, or a forgery. Archeology is extremely interesting and I respect all in the field, but don’t make false claims under the guise of, I’m an archeologist… so my word is gospel.


I'm not against Biblical Archaeology at all, its a nice magazine. The majority it is directed at proving a hypothesis instead of refuting a hypothesis. So by standard, it does not follow the scientific method.
And the shroud is indeed a forgery. The C-14 evidence, the phytolith analysis, the neutron activation analysis, metallurgical analysis, XRF, and DNA analysis all are in agreement that it is a forgery. C-14 says it is 400-450 yrs old, phytolith anlaysis says the shroud is from central Italy, neutron activation says the various paints are from Italy, Spain, and France. Metallurgical analysis says the stuff that looks like blood are iron and lead based paint, XRF analysis says there is a good bit of chromium and cyanide in the paints, and DNA says that the stuff that looks like human blood is not blood at all but rather metal based paint, and the shroud is made of flax which is linen.


I read an article that agrees with the 4400-500 year old data on the shroud but where the article deviates is that the samples tested were from a patch to repair the shroud from fire damage which does actually fit that time frame


When I need expert advice I tend to talk to myself
The older I get the better I used to be
Re: Archeological question [Re: imadeerhntr] #4015058
11/12/23 01:39 PM
11/12/23 01:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
Skinny Offline
GUVNER
Skinny  Offline
GUVNER
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 65,249
Luverne, AL
That was the old original test from the 1980's when the sample size was a large cutting taken from a damaged section of the shroud. Later tests were done in to 2000's with AMS dating (Accelerator Mass Spectrometer) with multiple samples from different parts of the shroud. Its about 450 years old.


Never Trust Government

"You can be broke but you cant be poor." Ruthie-May Webster
Re: Archeological question [Re: jawbone] #4015095
11/12/23 02:35 PM
11/12/23 02:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 22,560
blount county alabama
jwalker77 Offline
Pumpkin
jwalker77  Offline
Pumpkin
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 22,560
blount county alabama
Originally Posted by jawbone
Originally Posted by jwalker77
Originally Posted by jawbone
Originally Posted by jwalker77
Likely some gentiles were there before Abraham ever went there. But it would be impossible for muslims to be there first because they were not on earth first.


Right. Since the lineage of the Jews and Muslims both go back to Abraham, they pretty much both are the same age.

But, to be fair, Abraham was not a muslim. But i dont think theres any proof nobody was there before Abraham got there. I think its unlikely he was first. Likely some other human had pitched a tent there before him.

No Abraham was not a Muslim, or Palestinian. We can assume he was a Jew since we are told he was one of God's Chosen people.

Yessir, exactly. So he was the first we have record of being there. And God himself , who made the land, gave it to Abraham and said it was his forever.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Aldeer.com Copyright 2001-2024 Aldeer LLP.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1
(Release build 20180111)
Page Time: 0.089s Queries: 15 (0.024s) Memory: 3.3066 MB (Peak: 3.6071 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2024-06-18 15:57:54 UTC