Originally Posted By: jlccoffee

We aren't disputing the biology. What we are disputing is that the regulations should allow as much freedom as possible while protecting the resource. No one said there should be no deer season...however if the resource could withstand that, why would we need a deer season? Same for other species.


so who decides?
the landowner that has 10,000 acres versus the guy like me with 80 acres? or pays to hunt another 400 acres

or the guy that has to hunt WMA's cause of finances

you said you only kill 3 a year at most anyways so what's the problem?

as much as I wanna throw up using this word

since the resource is owned by we the people then it has to be shared but those paying for it, it's only fair

“Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it.” ― Ronald Reagan