|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
66 registered members (Frankie, wareagul, Ten37, GomerPyle, Ben2, taggedout, Reptar, somedude, ts1979flh, hunter84, Treelimb, BPI, Shmoe, RCHRR, SC53, doublefistful, Raspy, meats132, HBWALKER14, Darrylcom, Coosa1, Geeb, Bronco 74, Okatuppa, Cuz-Pat, globe, CNC, zwick, RebFormanUDA, JA, claybird, BCLC, RockFarmer, Jdkprp70, mw2015, 300gr, Bustinbeards, Bowfish, Mbrock, Emile, 7PTSPREAD, Turkeytrott82, rwh1, PossumPecker, jmj120, Tree Dweller, BamaBoHunter, jawbone, Bandit635, BrentsFX4, AU67Skeeter, UABCPA, goodman_hunter, hallb, rrice0725, Grokamole, dagwood, TwoRs, Spec, 3Gs, burbank, 5 invisible),
1,075
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag?
[Re: Fuzzy_Bunny]
#3565847
12/29/21 12:30 AM
12/29/21 12:30 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,538
North AL
AU338MAG
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,538
North AL
|
You sure it’s not a 264 win mag? 264 Winchester magnum was introduced in 1957 or 1958. If it's really a 1952 M70 it predates that cartridge by a few years. Since the op couldn’t remember the chambering, I didn’t really put much stock in the gun being a 1952 model and 264 win mag just seemed to fit better. It's more likely a 92 M70 than a 52 😁
Dying ain't much of a living boy...Josey Wales
Molon Labe
|
|
|
|
