Plenty of decent points there, CNC, and I appreciate your take. You are correct in addressing the land size issue by alluding to any practice which may have a noticed importance on a small tract, but which that same practice may have zero affect at a macro-level on a large one. Definitely a fair point. Many options get thrown out quickly as actual options when smaller tracts are involved, no doubt; quirkier options then becoming more feasable possibly. Quoting David Lee Roth--- "Do the best with what you got!"