|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 registered members (kpswihart, Teacher One, fingers, Beulahboy, MarksOutdoors, Tree Dweller, Jwbfx4, JA, Ben2, MGrubber, Narrow Gap, jb20, Bustinbeards, SWilliamson, cartervj, Tall Dog, capehorn24, FreeStateHunter, Dragfan66, Jay512, BCLC, Possum Hunter, booner, Standbanger, wk2hnt, low wall, !shiloh!, joe sixpack, JCL, Backwards cowboy, Brian_C, Double Down, Mbrock, MikeP, GHTiger10, SilentSwineSlayr, dagwood, Peach, janiemae, Bmyers142, fish251, Pwyse, Young20, BOFF, Mdees, Turkey_neck, curt99rsv, jprice, AU7MM08, m2ruger, PourIron12, Scout10, Huntn2feed5, wareagle22, Shmoe, Big Al, Ray_Coon, doublefistful, 25-20, DoeNut, cmontgomery, SC53, 10 invisible),
428
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Land buying spin-off
[Re: ford150man]
#3312099
01/03/21 10:12 PM
01/03/21 10:12 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,631
Lower Alabama
Andalusia
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,631
Lower Alabama
|
I would avoid deeded access, it is fine from a legal aspect but there can be issues on who maintains the ROW and you may like the current owners but if they sell you might be stuck with owners who are not great!
Just one less potential headache if you can avoid!
If possible, I would want 40+ and maybe backing up to forest land or surrounded by large tracts.
"If you are the smartest person in the room, you're in the wrong room"
"How you do Anything, is how you do Everything"
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it"
|
|
|
|
