|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
42 registered members (longshot, odocoileus, hippi, headshot1, BamaBoHunter, mzzy, BPI, booner, Jstocks, twaldrop4, Mulcher, Driveby, Catbird, CeeHawk37, Morris, slipperyrock, Fishduck, Chancetribe, jmj120, Hunter454, hallb, CNC, Floorman1, Pwyse, Bowfish, Fullthrottle, 3Gs, Bigem1958, skoor, dave260rem!, Whiskey9, HHSyelper, Geeb, claybird, NoHuntin, Sixpointholler, blazer625, buzzard, Longtine, 3 invisible),
809
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Record year for deer harvest
[Re: CNC]
#3309646
01/01/21 10:08 AM
01/01/21 10:08 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,863
Montgomery, Alabama
jaredhunts
Puts sugar in his cornbread!
|
Puts sugar in his cornbread!
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 13,863
Montgomery, Alabama
|
They must be looking for some good PR or something.......Enforcing the confirmation numbers at the processor is what is causing a big increase in the number reported......Because of that you can't really make a call as to how we compare to years past If the numbers aren't where they want them to be this year, what do they enforce next?
|
|
|
|
