|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iso
by AustinC. 05/21/24 05:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 registered members (SuperSpike, MarksOutdoors, Wes7777, !shiloh!, mw2015, AustinC, cartervj, Scooter7, hoggin, Livintohunt19, Pwyse, baitstop, lthrstkg1, HappyHunter, Scdoghunter667, 3Gs, Andalusia, CAL, bamaguzzi, JB71, Tupi, JHL, janiemae, Hotrod20, FreeStateHunter, Rockstar007, Okatuppa, Dubie, Bruno, brushwhacker, 3bailey3, coachg34, Jmfire722, k bush, deerman24, slanddeerhunter, Bowfish, MountainTopHunter, Mmiller, Chaser357, Floorman1, sj22, Roondog, MikeP, BBD23, BobK, jaredhunts, bass1090, AU7MM08, XVIII, Jason Carroll, bamaeyedoc, Morris, cng0004, trlrdrdave, doublefistful, low wall, Exhoosier, fillmore, jwalker77, therealhojo, Cactus_buck, Birdman83, Skinner, WoodleyRoadDeer, hamma, T Bone, hawndog, Dragfan66, scrape, Frankie, BigA47, AU338MAG, HDS64, Nowlide, eclipse829, Big Al, MS_Hunter, BCLC, Hunter454, wk2hnt, Big AL 76, Brent, Chipnalong, rkt, square, Rem870s2, AWT6, JAM, WC82, CatfishJunkie, Moss, OlTimer, WhoMe, treemydog, Paddlejon, kaferhaus, Justice, GomerPyle, HHSyelper, jameyr, UARandy3, lckrn, deerhunter_1, Fishhead706, Bustinbeards, Fedex 1, RCHRR, smallgame, Gunner211, Ray_Coon, sbo1971, booner, Paint Rock 00, Cfh76, AL18, tombo51, 9 invisible),
628
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: $$$-Treated Lumber vs Composite Decking?
[Re: ronfromramer]
#3224017
09/20/20 02:50 PM
09/20/20 02:50 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,806
USA
Remington270
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,806
USA
|
Conventional should be reaching the price of composite I checked earlier this week and 5/4 treated decking had almost tripled and composite was only a little more expensive than treated. Ridiculous, I'll wait a while Then I’d buy composite. Won’t splinter and lasts forever.
|
|
|
|
