|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 registered members (Bushmaster, Moss, JAT, Woody1, quickshot, eclipse829, 7mmSTW, bhammedic84, BCLC, janiemae, Frankie, MC21, imadeerhntr, TurkeyJoe, RCHRR, Todd1700, grundan, coosabuckhunter, Jweeks, Turkey, msims767, FX4, OutdoorsAL, Tree Dweller, 3 invisible),
407
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Bump stocks
[Re: GomerPyle]
#3184721
08/05/20 07:18 PM
08/05/20 07:18 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,155
In front of my lathe
gundoc
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,155
In front of my lathe
|
As I've explained on multiple occasions, saying we were "butthurt" over the bump stock is being intellectually dishonest. What we were "butt hurt" over was the abuse of power and the extremely dangerous precedent that it set. It had ZERO to do with the bump stock itself. They're stupid and useless and, in my PERSONAL opinion, a complete waste of money. But "reclassifying" them as a "machine gun" so as to retroactively ban them is absurd and dangerous.
Perfectly stated!
There are two types of gun enthusiasts ... Those who have been F#CKED by PTG and those who will be!
~ unknown
|
|
|
|
