|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iso
by AustinC. 05/21/24 05:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 registered members (antlerhunter, Beulahboy, Herdbull, NonTypical, AJones, doghouse, scrape, dustymac, Pwyse, M48scout, akbejeepin, coldtrail, grundan, Coosa buck, JohnG, Paint Rock 00, SC53, jwalker77, Tree Dweller, AUHoss79, CatfishJunkie, capehorn24, Whiskey9, Southal, Young20, 000buck, Obsession, canvasback, jaredhunts, CeeHawk37, PapaD, bug54, Thread Killer, hayman, Chaser357, globe, TDog93, Luxfisher, Daveleeal, jmj120, BC_Reb, MC21, DuckDown11, Zbrann, 5 invisible),
454
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Bump stocks
[Re: GomerPyle]
#3184626
08/05/20 04:49 PM
08/05/20 04:49 PM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,930
Cullman
CKyleC
(Can't Keep It Up...)
|
(Can't Keep It Up...)
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,930
Cullman
|
As I've explained on multiple occasions, saying we were "butthurt" over the bump stock is being intellectually dishonest. What we were "butt hurt" over was the abuse of power and the extremely dangerous precedent that it set. It had ZERO to do with the bump stock itself. They're stupid and useless and, in my PERSONAL opinion, a complete waste of money. But "reclassifying" them as a "machine gun" so as to retroactively ban them is absurd and dangerous.
Buy this man a beer!! Very well put
"In Alabama, we prefer to kill small bucks on big properties"-Turkey247
|
|
|
|
