|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iso
by AustinC. 05/21/24 05:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 registered members (Dean, blade, PanolaProductions, Fishduck, GoldenEagle, rwh1, Dragfan66, Jstocks, DoeNut, buck_buster, RCHRR, sawdust, skoor, MS_Hunter, dsmc, Paxamus, WINMAG300, longshot, BCLC, Bows4evr, cmontgomery, CeeHawk37, gastoka, salock, hitek, Ray_Coon, lthrstkg1, blazer625, TurkeyJoe, snakebit, GomerPyle, hamma, Bulls eye, Gut Pile 32, Cannon Kid, dirtwrk, riflenut, Brian_C, Thisldu, TexasHuntress, BradB, Shaneomac2, jawbone, catdoctor, Alb, scrubbuck, Bmyers142, Scout308, klay, Tree Dweller, Beer Belly, BPI, NICHOLS3, CrappieMan, coldtrail, AUjerbear, Hunting-231, Backwards cowboy, Okatuppa, NotsoBright, TCG5, 7PTSPREAD, TroyBoy1988, GmeHunter, CNC, JohnG, Booner Hunter, robinhedd, Goatkiller, Hoytdad10, William, RSF, 000buck, Jdkprp70, DMC, clayk, BD, Whild_Bill, deadeye48, Swamp Dog, Exhoosier, AU coonhunter, jake44, Joe4majors, eclipse829, FreeStateHunter, CCC, Jbf, Bigbamaboy, KnightRyder, cartervj, MarksOutdoors, aubigmac, Turberville, slippinlipjr, Whiskey9, Brign002, hallb, bug54, Mack1, Sixpointholler, Huntn2feed5, bass1090, tnob, BentBarrel, centralala, Ridge Life, 380jeff, akbejeepin, Team_Stuckem, AWT6, woodduck, JA, Lvlhdd, Cahabariverrat, HHSyelper, Luxfisher, Young20, RockFarmer, hue, 10 invisible),
761
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Game Check (# of deer not being reported)
[Re: hallb]
#3026855
01/29/20 12:12 PM
01/29/20 12:12 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,780
central ala,
centralala
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,780
central ala,
|
You know a guy that has killed 8 bucks? If he reported them, POSSIBLY could be perfectly legal. If only 3 had antlers and the other 5 were spotted fawns.... How many people really know the reason for the recording system, not game check. The recording system came about around 2007 when Ditchkoff and a committee were charged with looking at buck limits. The idea was to get a better ratio of older bucks in the herd in the state. Ditchkoff pushed for a recording system to aid in keeping hunters honest. All sounds good to this point. Then comes a recording system where buck fawns do not count against the buck limit. Now, I'm no biologist but I know if you are trying to get older bucks, killing them at 3 months of age and not counting them ain't gonna get you there. That dead 3 month old will never reach maturity. Totally defeats the purpose of having the limit.
|
|
|
|
