|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iso
by AustinC. 05/21/24 05:01 PM
|
|
36 registered members (Baker8425, deerkiller25, CKyleC, rblaker, akbejeepin, WINMAG300, C3SEAST, Sixpointholler, Todd1700, Stacey, cullmanbamafan, sw1002, Booner Hunter, Big AL 76, Bronco 74, woodduck, Mulcher, Fullthrottle, Whild_Bill, Lonster, canine933, 1hunter, TexasHuntress, Birdman83, mzzy, ucmducks, Ridge Life, jaydub12, Cactus_buck, YellaLineHunter, klay, Ten37, apolloslade, Cuz-Pat, 2 invisible),
710
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Barbour Co. experiment??
[Re: Out back]
#2943303
11/02/19 06:16 PM
11/02/19 06:16 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,867 West Alabama
Ant67
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,867
West Alabama
|
Additional regulations can be enacted by any county. Your county commission has the legal authority to add or amend game regulations. Duh hell???
|
|
|
Re: Barbour Co. experiment??
[Re: centralala]
#2944866
11/04/19 12:00 PM
11/04/19 12:00 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,214 B'ham
Goatkiller
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,214
B'ham
|
How bout this... Chucky needs to produce a report that says the more deer you shoot in a season... the less you have the following season.
As far as Barbour county's antler restrictions are concerned you save a spike by letting him walk and the next season it gets killed as a still immature deer it just has the beginnings of a decent rack.
That's about all there is to this whole thing.
Shoot small bucks and you won't have any big bucks. Ever. Don't shoot one.... and your neighbor will probably kill it for you as his/her 6th buck they have shot this season. Shoot a doe and have 2-3 less deer the next season and likely one less buck you will get to blast as a basket rack. Repeat the process.
Simple. Nobody should need a report to tell them what is common sense.
Chuck running around like a prick arguing over stuff... this is nothing more than a peeing match between someone who is about 100% Stupid and a whole lot of people (thousands) much more stupid than him.
Last edited by Goatkiller; 11/04/19 12:07 PM.
No government employees were harmed in the making of this mess.
|
|
|
Re: Barbour Co. experiment??
[Re: hawndog]
#2946197
11/05/19 02:22 PM
11/05/19 02:22 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,811 USA
Remington270
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,811
USA
|
Restrictions on bucks only means more people will shoot does. More does killed means less deer. Less deer means less bucks You won't convince anyone of this, I assure you. It's been gospel for 30+ years now. "Killing does is good."
|
|
|
Re: Barbour Co. experiment??
[Re: NightHunter]
#2946199
11/05/19 02:23 PM
11/05/19 02:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,361
mman
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,361
|
That answers my question.
Unless things have changed 99% of information goes through or has to be approved by Montgomery.
To a finer point, knowing anything produced for widespread consumption has to be approved through Montgomery and we have established that you have no trust in that process, should the DCNR staff even bother with putting that kind of information together? Will it take a complete overhaul of Montgomery, meaning all the way down to district/program supervisors before you will take stock in anything produced by the DCNR?
Ultimately the Commissioner is in charge but he takes direction from the Governor. The governor takes heat from senators, congressmen, county/city officials and lobbyists.
Day to day DCNR operations are really handled by the Chiefs and Assistant Chiefs.
I guess my question is, how would you fix this? I mean real world answers. Not hire someone from ALDEER to clean house and take over. There’s a lot of moving parts and educational requirements to hold DCNR positions.
Where would you as a member of the hunting public suggest start to right the course.
I would be more apt to believe raw numbers and draw my own conclusions than what I read in a report. The only way I know to fix trust issues is total honesty over a long period of time, period.
|
|
|
Re: Barbour Co. experiment??
[Re: Coosa1]
#2946200
11/05/19 02:25 PM
11/05/19 02:25 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,811 USA
Remington270
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 21,811
USA
|
Unpopular opinion but it's mine so I'll voice it. I wish the state would go back to two weeks of doe days and set antler restrictions for the entire state. I'm tired of having to drive hours to find a decent population of deer to hunt. Damn coosa county rednecks shoot everything that moves and brag about killing all three of their bucks a year that might have a total of 50" of bone between all three of them.
Oh and get rid of that damn baiting bill while they're at it too! You have to drive hours from Coosa County? Drive south or southeast just a little bit and you've got the best hunting in the state. It may not be in your literal back yard, but it's not like you're in Marshall county or something.
Last edited by Remington270; 11/05/19 02:25 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Barbour Co. experiment??
[Re: Coosa1]
#2946842
11/05/19 10:17 PM
11/05/19 10:17 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,375 Jasper, AL
joshm28
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,375
Jasper, AL
|
Unpopular opinion but it's mine so I'll voice it. I wish the state would go back to two weeks of doe days and set antler restrictions for the entire state. I'm tired of having to drive hours to find a decent population of deer to hunt. Damn coosa county rednecks shoot everything that moves and brag about killing all three of their bucks a year that might have a total of 50" of bone between all three of them.
Oh and get rid of that damn baiting bill while they're at it too! It’s not as unpopular as you think. In the part of Fayette County I hunt I would love a much reduced doe season. (We have only killed 2 in 5 years on our lease. Our population, this year, is actually really good. Just 2-3 years of reducing doe days would make a huge difference in some parts of the state
|
|
|
|