Somebody TOOK the freedom to begin with. But, you would have the audacity to suggest that is wrong to want it back??????"
Do these two quotes look familiar??? And then turn around and state with authority "If too many are killed, lower the limit??"
Who is suggesting the taking away of freedoms????????
Fun4all, you're getting so close to getting it. One of those is for no reason other than that's the way I was brought up. The other would be for protecting the herd.
Interesting view! Let me see if I am "getting it". Being able to pour "bait" out of a bag to make it easier to kill deer, which in turn increases the number of deer killed protects the herd. Under the current regs a person can legally "bait" but chooses not to because of many factors like they just don't want to go to the trouble, or the expense, or the State won't let me do it MY way, or any other myriad of reasons (yep, you can read that as "excuse") and kills less deer doesn't protect the herd.
There I GOT IT!!!!
Oh wait a minute, easier to kill results in more deer killed and more impact to the deer herd equal less herd protection. Choosing not to legally bait for whatever reason is not as easy as pouring "bait" out of a bag and results in less kills and overall impact to the deer herd equals protects herd.
Dang and I was so close!!! Guess I will have to keep on working on that one.
How do you know it would increase the number of deer killed? Is Georgia now going to kill so many deer they will not have any left? WHy are there still deer in other states where they have been baiting for years?
If you are interested in protecting the herd, why do you not lobby against gun season? Killing a deer over corn is detrimental to the herd but killing one with a high power rifle is not? That arguement doesn't make any sense.
