|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iso
by AustinC. 05/21/24 05:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 registered members (Robert D., sportrep, Narrow Gap, abolt300, Coosa buck, COOTER, Chiller, Turkey Petter, Floorman1, TEM, Tree Dweller, curt99rsv, Gobl4me, Booner Hunter, 11020, Andalusia, dustymac, BamaBoHunter, Cactus_buck, Cynical, jlbuc10, !shiloh!, ALMODUX, bass1090, BPI, imadeerhntr, Thread Killer, Peach, M48scout, Luxfisher, Mbrock, limabean, outdoorguy88, jaredhunts, filespinner, Jwillbucks, BBD23, goodman_hunter, mzzy, Chaser357, capehorn24, wareagle22, buzzard, Austin1, sawdust, 3Gs, Skinner, AJones, JA, Dragfan66, StateLine, Gunpowder, 2 invisible),
643
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Your "best scope values"
[Re: burbank]
#2725950
02/02/19 11:18 AM
02/02/19 11:18 AM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
R_H_Clark
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
|
Isn’t nightforce made by LOW?
Seriously, I’ve never had any of the scopes mentioned fail to track or maintain zero. Of course, I try not to drop them from the stand....but I don’t baby them either.
As a matter of fact, he only scoopes to ever break in me was a Nikon Bucknaster (old style).
What do you call "tracking" though? If by saying that all those scopes have tracked you mean that you were able to zero them,that does not equal tracking properly. Like I said,take some of them out and crank them to the full extent of the erector both directions and back a dozen times and then see if it will set it back to your zero dead on. Shoot a 20 round box test with 5 shots in each corner of your box. If it tracks then,it tracks.
|
|
|
|
