|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 registered members (Floorman1, dave260rem!, SEWoodsWhitetail, timberwolfe, Dilbert, Hoytdad10, thayerp81, hayman, riflenut, Young20, twaldrop4, Jus_me, Turkey_neck, jb20, BCLC, deadeye48, Ant67, Jstocks, TurkeyJoe, CarbonClimber1, Dog, foldemup, BC, Koba, sanderson, abolt300, CNC, Pwyse, Chickenrig, outdoorguy88, oakachoy, Morgan, mopar, ShoeFly, somedude, Whiskey9, fish251, AU coonhunter, CB5121, Downwind, GomerPyle, sj22, Acorn, Chancetribe, jwalker77, dquick1, PapaD, SWilliamson, Luxfisher, HDS64, MCbama, Dubie, Tall Dog, Jtb51b, RidgeRanger, Fishduck, coldtrail, sawdust, odocoileus, SouthBamaSlayer, Tree Dweller, Big AL 76, geeb1, Lvlhdd, clayk, MikeP, Shaneomac2, Narrow Gap, scrape, !shiloh!, JLMiller, Austin1, abamadude, jhardy, USeeMSpurs, beerhunter, Showout, Hunting-231, low wall, hallb, blade, Bowfish, Driveby, hunter84, dawgdr, William, Kang, Mike59, JCL, HoofNSpur, HURRICANE, Red Fox, Rainbowstew, cmontgomery, claybird, Chipnalong, DEDTRKY, RocN151, Turberville, Coosa1, Reptar, CatfishJunkie, 6 invisible),
550
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: What is your desired deer density?
[Re: Remington270]
#2671959
12/13/18 08:31 PM
12/13/18 08:31 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,423
Atoler
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,423
|
I don’t really care what biologist or qdma says, I’ve hunted a lot of properties in Alabama, and if you told me to pick 3 places that I felt most confident I could hunt for a week in the rut and kill a 125+, all three places that come to mind, have a lot of deer. Like double digit sightings a majority of the time. Those places also have very few deer killed, one place hasn’t had does killed since 1987. That place, you might see 30 deer on a good sit, maybe only 3 or 4 bucks, but your liable to see a mature deer just about every day. I just have never seen a positive correlation to drastically reducing your does and having better “big buck” hunting in the future years. It’s always been the opposite .
|
|
|
|