Originally Posted by 257wbymag
Originally Posted by ikillbux
I'm just puttin' it out there. In Alabama, deer hunting, there is zero justifiable difference between an EQUALLY SIZED pair of $1,000 binos and $250 binos. There is, however, a justifiable difference between the $250 and the $75 pair. If you can't see every deer you'll ever try to look at with some 10x42 Nikon ProStaffs (or equivalent Vortex), your problem isn't the binos, and/or you've found that 1 / 1bazillion circumstance. Like I said, after that, you're just having a goober-shakin contest.


Very dumb post there.

Whatever, my Swaros will find a deer at 200yds, Dawn/dusk when the $250 pair of nikons still see dark... In Alaska and here again in Oregon, we laid out multiple pair of binos and compared on more than one occasion. The big 3 wins every time. Swaros, Leica, Zeiss.
When I had a guy look at a bear in a thicket and point it out, I looked through my Nikons, nothing. Called BS and took his binos. Big ass brown bear staring right at us... There's a difference. His glass by the way were SLCs